kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Fix irq refcount leak in kvm_vgic_set_owner()
Date: Thu,  6 Jun 2019 11:58:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1559818688-20638-3-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1559818688-20638-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

kvm_vgic_set_owner() leaks a reference on the vgic_irq descriptor,
which does not seem to match up with any vgic_put_irq() that I can
find.

Since the irq pointer is not passed out and the caller must anyway
subsequently use vgic_get_irq() when is wants a pointer, it is not
clear why we should have a dangling refcount here.

The refcount is still needed inside kvm_vgic_set_owner() to prevent
the vgic_irq struct from disappearing while while it is
manipulated.

So, keep it vgic_get_irq() here, but add the matching
vgic_put_irq() before returning.

unreferenced object 0xffff800b6365ab80 (size 128):
  comm "qemu-system-aar", pid 14414, jiffies 4300822606 (age 84.436s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 b0 e1 e0 38 00 00 ff ff  ...........8....
    b0 e1 e0 38 00 00 ff ff 78 e6 ad dd 0a 80 ff ff  ...8....x.......
  backtrace:
    [<00000000a08b80e2>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x178/0x208
    [<00000000114591cb>] vgic_add_lpi.part.5+0x34/0x190
    [<00000000ec1425ae>] vgic_its_cmd_handle_mapi+0x320/0x348
    [<00000000935c5c32>] vgic_its_process_commands.part.14+0x350/0x8b8
    [<00000000dc256d2c>] vgic_mmio_write_its_cwriter+0x78/0x98
    [<000000008659acd2>] dispatch_mmio_write+0xd4/0x120

[...]

Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Fixes: c6ccd30e0de3 ("KVM: arm/arm64: Introduce an allocator for in-kernel irq lines")
Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>

---

Based on the limited testing I've done so far, the patch _appears_ to
fix the bug.

However, I still don't understand which the bug is intermittent, or why
the arch_timer or pmu (the only apparent users of kvm_vgic_set_owner())
are claiming an LPI in the first place.

So there may be other bugs in the mix, or I may have misunderstood
something...

The bug (and fix) were observed with native qemu on ThunderX2, on a
merge of v5.1 with kvmarm/next commit 9eecfc22e0bf ("KVM: arm64: Fix
ptrauth ID register masking logic").

My qemu invocation was:

$ qemu-system-aarch64 -machine virt,accel=kvm,gic_version=3 -cpu host \
    -smp 4 -nographic \
    -drive id=vblock,file=block.qcow2,format=qcow2,if=none \
    -device virtio-blk-device,drive=vblock \
    -kernel Image -append 'root=/dev/vda1 ro'
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
index 191decc..930319c 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
@@ -599,6 +599,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_set_owner(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int intid, void *owner)
 	else
 		irq->owner = owner;
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+	vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.1.4

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-06 10:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-06 10:58 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: A couple of memory leak fixes Dave Martin
2019-06-06 10:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Fix kvm_device leak in vgic_its_destroy Dave Martin
2019-06-06 10:58 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2019-06-06 12:06   ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Fix irq refcount leak in kvm_vgic_set_owner() Marc Zyngier
2019-06-06 12:34     ` Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1559818688-20638-3-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).