kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] KVM: arm64: Provide a PV_TIME device to user space
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2019 17:10:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a7d5be6-184b-0c78-61a3-b01730cb5df9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190803135113.6cdf500c@why>

On 03/08/2019 13:51, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri,  2 Aug 2019 15:50:14 +0100
> Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
> 
>> Allow user space to inform the KVM host where in the physical memory
>> map the paravirtualized time structures should be located.
>>
>> A device is created which provides the base address of an array of
>> Stolen Time (ST) structures, one for each VCPU. There must be (64 *
>> total number of VCPUs) bytes of memory available at this location.
>>
>> The address is given in terms of the physical address visible to
>> the guest and must be 64 byte aligned. The memory should be marked as
>> reserved to the guest to stop it allocating it for other purposes.
> 
> Why? You seem to be allocating the memory from the kernel, so as far as
> the guest is concerned, this isn't generally usable memory.

I obviously didn't word it very well - that's what I meant. The "memory"
that represents the stolen time structure shouldn't be shown to the
guest as normal memory, but "reserved" for the purpose of stolen time.

To be honest it looks like I forgot to rewrite this commit message -
which 64 byte alignment is all that the guest can rely on (because each
vCPU has it's own structure), the actual array of structures needs to be
page aligned to ensure we can safely map it into the guest.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h  |   2 +
>>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h |   6 +
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile           |   1 +
>>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h          |   2 +
>>  virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c                |  44 +++++++
>>  virt/kvm/arm/pvtime.c             | 190 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  6 files changed, 245 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 virt/kvm/arm/pvtime.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
>> index befe37d4bc0e..88c8a4b2836f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
>> @@ -157,6 +157,8 @@ int kvm_alloc_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm);
>>  void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm *kvm);
>>  int kvm_phys_addr_ioremap(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t guest_ipa,
>>  			  phys_addr_t pa, unsigned long size, bool writable);
>> +int kvm_phys_addr_memremap(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t guest_ipa,
>> +			  phys_addr_t pa, unsigned long size, bool writable);
>>  
>>  int kvm_handle_guest_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run);
>>  
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> index 9a507716ae2f..95516a4198ea 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>> @@ -367,6 +367,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_events {
>>  #define KVM_PSCI_RET_INVAL		PSCI_RET_INVALID_PARAMS
>>  #define KVM_PSCI_RET_DENIED		PSCI_RET_DENIED
>>  
>> +/* Device Control API: PV_TIME */
>> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_PV_TIME_PADDR	0
>> +#define  KVM_DEV_ARM_PV_TIME_ST		0
>> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_PV_TIME_STATE_SIZE	1
>> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_PV_TIME_STATE	2
>> +
>>  #endif
>>  
>>  #endif /* __ARM_KVM_H__ */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> index 73dce4d47d47..5ffbdc39e780 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/kvm_main.o $(KVM)/coalesced_mmio.o $(KVM)/e
>>  kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/arm.o $(KVM)/arm/mmu.o $(KVM)/arm/mmio.o
>>  kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/psci.o $(KVM)/arm/perf.o
>>  kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/hypercalls.o
>> +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/pvtime.o
>>  
>>  kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += inject_fault.o regmap.o va_layout.o
>>  kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += hyp.o hyp-init.o handle_exit.o
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> index a7c19540ce21..04bffafa0708 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>> @@ -1222,6 +1222,8 @@ enum kvm_device_type {
>>  #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_ITS	KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_ITS
>>  	KVM_DEV_TYPE_XIVE,
>>  #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_XIVE		KVM_DEV_TYPE_XIVE
>> +	KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PV_TIME,
>> +#define KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PV_TIME	KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_PV_TIME
>>  	KVM_DEV_TYPE_MAX,
>>  };
>>  
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> index 38b4c910b6c3..be28a4aee451 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
>> @@ -1368,6 +1368,50 @@ int kvm_phys_addr_ioremap(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t guest_ipa,
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>  
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_phys_addr_memremap - map a memory range to guest IPA
>> + *
>> + * @kvm:	The KVM pointer
>> + * @guest_ipa:	The IPA at which to insert the mapping
>> + * @pa:		The physical address of the memory
>> + * @size:	The size of the mapping
>> + */
>> +int kvm_phys_addr_memremap(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t guest_ipa,
>> +			  phys_addr_t pa, unsigned long size, bool writable)
>> +{
>> +	phys_addr_t addr, end;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	unsigned long pfn;
>> +	struct kvm_mmu_memory_cache cache = { 0, };
>> +
>> +	end = (guest_ipa + size + PAGE_SIZE - 1) & PAGE_MASK;
>> +	pfn = __phys_to_pfn(pa);
>> +
>> +	for (addr = guest_ipa; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> +		pte_t pte = pfn_pte(pfn, PAGE_S2);
>> +
>> +		if (writable)
>> +			pte = kvm_s2pte_mkwrite(pte);
>> +
>> +		ret = mmu_topup_memory_cache(&cache,
>> +					     kvm_mmu_cache_min_pages(kvm),
>> +					     KVM_NR_MEM_OBJS);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			goto out;
>> +		spin_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> +		ret = stage2_set_pte(kvm, &cache, addr, &pte, 0);
>> +		spin_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			goto out;
>> +
>> +		pfn++;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	mmu_free_memory_cache(&cache);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
> 
> This is an exact copy of kvm_phys_addr_ioremap(), with only the memory
> attributes changing. Surely we can have a shared implementation that
> takes the memory attribute as a parameter.

Good point - although due to below I'm going to need something which can
deal with non-contiguous memory...

>> +
>>  static bool transparent_hugepage_adjust(kvm_pfn_t *pfnp, phys_addr_t *ipap)
>>  {
>>  	kvm_pfn_t pfn = *pfnp;
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pvtime.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pvtime.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..9051bc07eae1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pvtime.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +// Copyright (C) 2019 Arm Ltd.
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>> +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>> +
>> +/* We currently only support PV time on ARM64 */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> 
> And we're only compiling it on arm64, so why the #ifdef?

Another good point - will remove.

>> +
>> +#include <asm/pvclock-abi.h>
>> +
>> +static int max_stolen_size(void)
>> +{
>> +	int size = KVM_MAX_VCPUS * sizeof(struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time_info);
> 
> So we're always allocating enough memory for 512 CPUs? That's an
> additional 32kB of contiguous memory...
> 
>> +
>> +	return ALIGN(size, PAGE_SIZE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int kvm_arm_pvtime_create(struct kvm_device *dev, u32 type)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_arch_pvtime *pvtime = &dev->kvm->arch.pvtime;
>> +
>> +	pvtime->st = alloc_pages_exact(max_stolen_size(),
>> +				       GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
>> +	if (!pvtime->st)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> Is there any chance we could use a vmalloc allocation instead? This
> would lift the requirement on having physically contiguous memory.

Yes I think it should be possible to use non-contiguous memory and vmalloc.

>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void kvm_arm_pvtime_destroy(struct kvm_device *dev)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_arch_pvtime *pvtime = &dev->kvm->arch.pvtime;
>> +
>> +	pvtime->st_base = GPA_INVALID;
>> +	free_pages_exact(pvtime->st, max_stolen_size());
>> +	kfree(dev);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int pvtime_map_pages(struct kvm *kvm, gpa_t guest_paddr,
>> +			    void *kaddr, int size)
>> +{
>> +	return kvm_phys_addr_memremap(kvm, guest_paddr,
>> +			virt_to_phys(kaddr),
>> +			size, false);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int pvtime_save_state(struct kvm *kvm, u64 type, void __user *user)
>> +{
>> +	void *source;
>> +	size_t size;
>> +
>> +	switch (type) {
>> +	case KVM_DEV_ARM_PV_TIME_ST:
>> +		source = kvm->arch.pvtime.st;
>> +		size = sizeof(struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time_info) *
>> +			atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (copy_to_user(user, source, size))
>> +		return -EFAULT;
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int pvtime_restore_state(struct kvm *kvm, u64 type, void __user *user)
>> +{
>> +	void *dest;
>> +	size_t size;
>> +
>> +	switch (type) {
>> +	case KVM_DEV_ARM_PV_TIME_ST:
>> +		dest = kvm->arch.pvtime.st;
>> +		size = sizeof(struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time_info) *
>> +			atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (copy_from_user(dest, user, size))
>> +		return -EFAULT;
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int kvm_arm_pvtime_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
>> +				   struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm_arch_pvtime *pvtime = &dev->kvm->arch.pvtime;
>> +	u64 __user *user = (u64 __user *)attr->addr;
>> +	u64 paddr;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	switch (attr->group) {
>> +	case KVM_DEV_ARM_PV_TIME_PADDR:
>> +		if (get_user(paddr, user))
>> +			return -EFAULT;
>> +		if (paddr & 63)
>> +			return -EINVAL;
> 
> You should check whether the device fits into the IPA space for this
> guest, and whether it overlaps with anything else.

pvtime_map_pages() should fail in the case of overlap. That seems
sufficient to me - do you think we need something stronger?

>> +		switch (attr->attr) {
>> +		case KVM_DEV_ARM_PV_TIME_ST:
>> +			if (pvtime->st_base != GPA_INVALID)
>> +				return -EEXIST;
>> +			ret = pvtime_map_pages(dev->kvm, paddr, pvtime->st,
>> +					max_stolen_size());
> 
> Consider moving the size directly into pvtime_map_pages(), and dropping
> the pvtime->st parameter. All you need is kvm and paddr.

Will do.

Thanks,

Steve
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-08-05 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-02 14:50 [PATCH 0/9] arm64: Stolen time support Steven Price
2019-08-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface Steven Price
2019-08-03 11:13   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-05 13:06     ` Steven Price
2019-08-05  3:23   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-08-05 13:06     ` Steven Price
2019-08-05 16:40   ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-08-07 13:21     ` Steven Price
2019-08-07 14:28       ` Christophe de Dinechin
2019-08-07 15:26         ` Steven Price
2019-08-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm/arm64: Factor out hypercall handling from PSCI code Steven Price
2019-08-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: arm64: Implement PV_FEATURES call Steven Price
2019-08-03 11:21   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-05 13:14     ` Steven Price
2019-08-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: arm64: Support stolen time reporting via shared structure Steven Price
2019-08-03 11:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-05 14:09     ` Steven Price
2019-08-03 17:58   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-03 18:13     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-05 14:18       ` Steven Price
2019-08-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: Allow kvm_device_ops to be const Steven Price
2019-08-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: arm64: Provide a PV_TIME device to user space Steven Price
2019-08-03 12:51   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-03 17:34     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-07 13:39       ` Steven Price
2019-08-07 13:51         ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-05 16:10     ` Steven Price [this message]
2019-08-05 16:28       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 7/9] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls Steven Price
2019-08-05 10:03   ` Will Deacon
2019-08-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper Steven Price
2019-08-02 14:50 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: Retrieve stolen time as paravirtualized guest Steven Price
2019-08-04  9:53   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-08 15:29     ` Steven Price
2019-08-08 15:49       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-09 13:51   ` Zenghui Yu
2019-08-12 10:39     ` Steven Price
2019-08-13  6:06       ` Zenghui Yu
2019-08-03 18:05 ` [PATCH 0/9] arm64: Stolen time support Marc Zyngier
2019-08-05 13:06   ` Steven Price
2019-08-05 13:26     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-14 13:02     ` Alexander Graf
2019-08-14 14:19       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-08-14 14:52         ` [UNVERIFIED SENDER] " Alexander Graf
2019-08-16 10:23           ` Steven Price
2020-07-21  3:26 ` zhukeqian
2020-07-27 10:48   ` Steven Price
2020-07-29  2:57     ` zhukeqian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1a7d5be6-184b-0c78-61a3-b01730cb5df9@arm.com \
    --to=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).