kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 4/5] KVM: arm/arm64: remove pmc->bitmask
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 20:01:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190617190105.4662-5-andrew.murray@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190617190105.4662-1-andrew.murray@arm.com>

We currently use pmc->bitmask to determine the width of the pmc - however
it's superfluous as the pmc index already describes if the pmc is a cycle
counter or event counter. The architecture clearly describes the widths of
these counters.

Let's remove the bitmask to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
---
 include/kvm/arm_pmu.h |  1 -
 virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c    | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
index b73f31baca52..2f0e28dc5a9e 100644
--- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
+++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
 struct kvm_pmc {
 	u8 idx;	/* index into the pmu->pmc array */
 	struct perf_event *perf_event;
-	u64 bitmask;
 };
 
 struct kvm_pmu {
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
index ae1e886d4a1a..0588ad0ddb77 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
@@ -25,6 +25,18 @@
 #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
 
 static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
+
+/**
+ * kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit - determine if select_idx is a 64bit counter
+ * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
+ * @select_idx: The counter index
+ */
+static bool kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
+{
+	return (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX &&
+		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC);
+}
+
 /**
  * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value
  * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
@@ -47,7 +59,10 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
 		counter += perf_event_read_value(pmc->perf_event, &enabled,
 						 &running);
 
-	return counter & pmc->bitmask;
+	if (!kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit(vcpu, select_idx))
+		counter = lower_32_bits(counter);
+
+	return counter;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -113,7 +128,6 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS; i++) {
 		kvm_pmu_stop_counter(vcpu, &pmu->pmc[i]);
 		pmu->pmc[i].idx = i;
-		pmu->pmc[i].bitmask = 0xffffffffUL;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -348,8 +362,6 @@ void kvm_pmu_software_increment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
  */
 void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
 {
-	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
-	struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
 	u64 mask;
 	int i;
 
@@ -368,11 +380,6 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
 		for (i = 0; i < ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX; i++)
 			kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(vcpu, i, 0);
 	}
-
-	if (val & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC) {
-		pmc = &pmu->pmc[ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX];
-		pmc->bitmask = 0xffffffffffffffffUL;
-	}
 }
 
 static bool kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
@@ -420,7 +427,10 @@ static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
 
 	counter = kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu, select_idx);
 	/* The initial sample period (overflow count) of an event. */
-	attr.sample_period = (-counter) & pmc->bitmask;
+	if (kvm_pmu_idx_is_64bit(vcpu, pmc->idx))
+		attr.sample_period = (-counter) & GENMASK(63, 0);
+	else
+		attr.sample_period = (-counter) & GENMASK(31, 0);
 
 	event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, -1, current,
 						 kvm_pmu_perf_overflow, pmc);
-- 
2.21.0

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-17 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-17 19:01 [PATCH v10 0/5] KVM: arm/arm64: add support for chained counters Andrew Murray
2019-06-17 19:01 ` [PATCH v10 1/5] KVM: arm/arm64: rename kvm_pmu_{enable/disable}_counter functions Andrew Murray
2019-06-17 19:01 ` [PATCH v10 2/5] KVM: arm/arm64: extract duplicated code to own function Andrew Murray
2019-06-17 19:01 ` [PATCH v10 3/5] KVM: arm/arm64: re-create event when setting counter value Andrew Murray
2019-06-17 19:01 ` Andrew Murray [this message]
2019-06-17 19:01 ` [PATCH v10 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: support chained PMU counters Andrew Murray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190617190105.4662-5-andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --to=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).