From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC3BC3A59E for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F97022DD3 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:37:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6F97022DD3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290854A5D2; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:37:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4In6+Z8k-xnh; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:37:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71894A5EE; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:37:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6944A572 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:37:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2-F3HRdl-Pi for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:37:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5644A562 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:37:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB49D337; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e112269-lin.arm.com (e112269-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.133]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A75E53F718; Wed, 21 Aug 2019 08:37:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Steven Price To: Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu Subject: [PATCH v3 09/10] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 16:36:55 +0100 Message-Id: <20190821153656.33429-10-steven.price@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190821153656.33429-1-steven.price@arm.com> References: <20190821153656.33429-1-steven.price@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Steven Price , Paolo Bonzini X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Rather than directly choosing which function to use based on psci_ops.conduit, use the new arm_smccc_1_1 wrapper instead. In some cases we still need to do some operations based on the conduit, but the code duplication is removed. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Steven Price --- arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c | 13 +++--- arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 80 ++++++++++++---------------------- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c index 9a07916af8dd..8eb52f3385e7 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7-bugs.c @@ -78,12 +78,13 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void) if (psci_ops.smccc_version == SMCCC_VERSION_1_0) break; + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, + ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res); + if ((int)res.a0 != 0) + return; + switch (psci_ops.conduit) { case PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC: - arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, - ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res); - if ((int)res.a0 != 0) - break; per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1; cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_hvc_switch_mm; @@ -91,10 +92,6 @@ static void cpu_v7_spectre_init(void) break; case PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC: - arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, - ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res); - if ((int)res.a0 != 0) - break; per_cpu(harden_branch_predictor_fn, cpu) = call_smc_arch_workaround_1; cpu_do_switch_mm = cpu_v7_smc_switch_mm; diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c index 1e43ba5c79b7..400a49aaae85 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c @@ -215,40 +215,31 @@ static int detect_harden_bp_fw(void) if (psci_ops.smccc_version == SMCCC_VERSION_1_0) return -1; + arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, + ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res); + + switch ((int)res.a0) { + case 1: + /* Firmware says we're just fine */ + return 0; + case 0: + break; + default: + return -1; + } + switch (psci_ops.conduit) { case PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC: - arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, - ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res); - switch ((int)res.a0) { - case 1: - /* Firmware says we're just fine */ - return 0; - case 0: - cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1; - /* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */ - smccc_start = NULL; - smccc_end = NULL; - break; - default: - return -1; - } + cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1; + /* This is a guest, no need to patch KVM vectors */ + smccc_start = NULL; + smccc_end = NULL; break; case PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC: - arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, - ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res); - switch ((int)res.a0) { - case 1: - /* Firmware says we're just fine */ - return 0; - case 0: - cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1; - smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start; - smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end; - break; - default: - return -1; - } + cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1; + smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start; + smccc_end = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_end; break; default: @@ -338,6 +329,7 @@ void __init arm64_enable_wa2_handling(struct alt_instr *alt, void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state) { + int conduit; if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_SSBD)) { pr_info_once("SSBD disabled by kernel configuration\n"); return; @@ -351,19 +343,10 @@ void arm64_set_ssbd_mitigation(bool state) return; } - switch (psci_ops.conduit) { - case PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC: - arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL); - break; + conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, + NULL); - case PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC: - arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, state, NULL); - break; - - default: - WARN_ON_ONCE(1); - break; - } + WARN_ON_ONCE(conduit == PSCI_CONDUIT_NONE); } static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, @@ -373,6 +356,7 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, bool required = true; s32 val; bool this_cpu_safe = false; + int conduit; WARN_ON(scope != SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU || preemptible()); @@ -397,18 +381,10 @@ static bool has_ssbd_mitigation(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry, return false; } - switch (psci_ops.conduit) { - case PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC: - arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, - ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res); - break; - - case PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC: - arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, - ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res); - break; + conduit = arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, + ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2, &res); - default: + if (conduit == PSCI_CONDUIT_NONE) { ssbd_state = ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN; if (!this_cpu_safe) __ssb_safe = false; -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm