From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
To: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Cc: andre.przywara@arm.com
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests RFC 07/10] arm: pmu: test 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 18:27:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191206172724.947-8-eric.auger@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191206172724.947-1-eric.auger@redhat.com>
---
arm/pmu.c | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arm/unittests.cfg | 6 +++
2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
index e185809..47d46a2 100644
--- a/arm/pmu.c
+++ b/arm/pmu.c
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ static void test_basic_event_count(void) {}
static void test_mem_access(void) {}
static void test_chained_counters(void) {}
static void test_chained_sw_incr(void) {}
+static void test_chain_promotion(void) {}
#elif defined(__aarch64__)
#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8
@@ -262,7 +263,6 @@ asm volatile(
: );
}
-
static void pmu_reset(void)
{
/* reset all counters, counting disabled at PMCR level*/
@@ -571,6 +571,126 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(void)
read_regn(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn(pmevcntr, 1));
}
+static void test_chain_promotion(void)
+{
+ uint32_t events[] = { 0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */, 0x1E /* CHAIN */};
+ void *addr = malloc(PAGE_SIZE);
+
+ if (!satisfy_prerequisites(events, ARRAY_SIZE(events)))
+ return;
+
+ /* Only enable CHAIN counter */
+ pmu_reset();
+ write_regn(pmevtyper, 0, events[0] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
+ write_regn(pmevtyper, 1, events[1] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
+ write_sysreg_s(0x2, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ isb();
+
+ mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
+ report("chain counter not counting if even counter is disabled",
+ !read_regn(pmevcntr, 0));
+
+ /* Only enable even counter */
+ pmu_reset();
+ write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFF0);
+ write_sysreg_s(0x1, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ isb();
+
+ mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
+ report("odd counter did not increment on overflow if disabled",
+ !read_regn(pmevcntr, 1) && (read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1));
+ report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value %ld", read_regn(pmevcntr, 0));
+ report_info("CHAIN counter #1 has value %ld", read_regn(pmevcntr, 1));
+ report_info("overflow counter %ld", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
+
+ /* start at 0xFFFFFFDC, +20 with CHAIN enabled, +20 with CHAIN disabled */
+ pmu_reset();
+ write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFDC);
+ isb();
+
+ mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
+ report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx", read_regn(pmevcntr, 0));
+
+ /* disable the CHAIN event */
+ write_sysreg_s(0x2, PMCNTENCLR_EL0);
+ mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
+ report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx", read_regn(pmevcntr, 0));
+ report("should have triggered an overflow on #0", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1);
+ report("CHAIN counter #1 shouldn't have incremented", !read_regn(pmevcntr, 1));
+
+ /* start at 0xFFFFFFDC, +20 with CHAIN disabled, +20 with CHAIN enabled */
+
+ pmu_reset();
+ write_sysreg_s(0x1, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFDC);
+ isb();
+ report_info("counter #0 = 0x%lx, counter #1 = 0x%lx overflow=0x%lx",
+ read_regn(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn(pmevcntr, 1),
+ read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
+
+ mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
+ report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx", read_regn(pmevcntr, 0));
+
+ /* enable the CHAIN event */
+ write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ isb();
+ mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
+ report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx", read_regn(pmevcntr, 0));
+
+ report("CHAIN counter #1 should have incremented and no overflow expected",
+ (read_regn(pmevcntr, 1) == 1) && !read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
+
+ report_info("CHAIN counter #1 = 0x%lx, overflow=0x%lx",
+ read_regn(pmevcntr, 1), read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
+
+ /* start as MEM_ACCESS/CPU_CYCLES and move to CHAIN/MEM_ACCESS */
+ pmu_reset();
+ write_regn(pmevtyper, 0, 0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */ | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
+ write_regn(pmevtyper, 1, 0x11 /* CPU_CYCLES */ | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
+ write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFDC);
+ isb();
+
+ mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
+ report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx", read_regn(pmevcntr, 0));
+
+ /* 0 becomes CHAINED */
+ write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ write_regn(pmevtyper, 1, 0x1E /* CHAIN */ | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
+ write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+
+ mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
+ report_info("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx", read_regn(pmevcntr, 0));
+
+ report("CHAIN counter #1 should have incremented and no overflow expected",
+ (read_regn(pmevcntr, 1) == 1) && !read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
+
+ report_info("CHAIN counter #1 = 0x%lx, overflow=0x%lx",
+ read_regn(pmevcntr, 1), read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
+
+ /* start as CHAIN/MEM_ACCESS and move to MEM_ACCESS/CPU_CYCLES */
+ pmu_reset();
+ write_regn(pmevtyper, 0, 0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */ | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
+ write_regn(pmevtyper, 1, 0x1E /* CHAIN */ | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
+ write_regn(pmevcntr, 0, 0xFFFFFFDC);
+ write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+
+ mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
+ report_info("counter #0=0x%lx, counter #1=0x%lx",
+ read_regn(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn(pmevcntr, 1));
+
+ write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+ write_regn(pmevtyper, 1, 0x11 /* CPU_CYCLES */ | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
+ write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
+
+ mem_access_loop(addr, 20, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
+ report("overflow is expected on counter 0", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 1);
+ report_info("counter #0=0x%lx, counter #1=0x%lx overflow=0x%lx",
+ read_regn(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn(pmevcntr, 1),
+ read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
+}
+
#endif
/*
@@ -773,6 +893,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
} else if (strcmp(argv[1], "chained-sw-incr") == 0) {
report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
test_chained_sw_incr();
+ } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "chain-promotion") == 0) {
+ report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
+ test_chain_promotion();
} else {
report_abort("Unknown subtest '%s'", argv[1]);
}
diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
index 1bd4319..eb6e87e 100644
--- a/arm/unittests.cfg
+++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
@@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ groups = pmu
arch = arm64
extra_params = -append 'chained-sw-incr'
+[pmu-chain-promotion]
+file = pmu.flat
+groups = pmu
+arch = arm64
+extra_params = -append 'chain-promotion'
+
# Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1
#[pmu-tcg-icount-1]
#file = pmu.flat
--
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-06 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-06 17:27 [kvm-unit-tests RFC 00/10] KVM: arm64: PMUv3 Event Counter Tests Eric Auger
2019-12-06 17:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 01/10] arm64: Provide read/write_sysreg_s Eric Auger
2019-12-06 17:36 ` Alexandru Elisei
2019-12-06 17:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 02/10] pmu: Let pmu tests take a sub-test parameter Eric Auger
2019-12-06 17:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 03/10] pmu: Add a pmu struct Eric Auger
2019-12-13 18:59 ` Andrew Jones
2019-12-06 17:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 04/10] pmu: Check Required Event Support Eric Auger
2019-12-13 19:10 ` Andrew Jones
2019-12-06 17:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 05/10] pmu: Basic event counter Tests Eric Auger
2019-12-06 17:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 06/10] pmu: Test chained counter Eric Auger
2019-12-06 17:27 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2019-12-06 17:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 08/10] arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions Eric Auger
2019-12-06 17:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 09/10] arm/arm64: gic: Introduce setup_irq() helper Eric Auger
2019-12-06 17:27 ` [kvm-unit-tests RFC 10/10] pmu: Test overflow interrupts Eric Auger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191206172724.947-8-eric.auger@redhat.com \
--to=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).