From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4550AC2D0C0 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0204824686 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:31:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0204824686 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6A24AEBF; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:30:59 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yfdvoO1qccHc; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:30:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C62C4AE93; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:30:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF754A7E4 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:30:57 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qD4g1vqot6H0 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:30:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2E04AC68 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:30:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6220030E; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:30:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com (unknown [10.37.6.20]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89B8B3F718; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:30:54 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Murray To: Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon Subject: [PATCH v2 11/18] KVM: arm64: don't trap Statistical Profiling controls to EL2 Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:30:18 +0000 Message-Id: <20191220143025.33853-12-andrew.murray@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20191220143025.33853-1-andrew.murray@arm.com> References: <20191220143025.33853-1-andrew.murray@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep Holla , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu As we now save/restore the profiler state there is no need to trap accesses to the statistical profiling controls. Let's unset the _TPMS bit. Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray --- arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c index 43487f035385..07ca783e7d9e 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/debug.c @@ -88,7 +88,6 @@ void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) * - Performance monitors (MDCR_EL2_TPM/MDCR_EL2_TPMCR) * - Debug ROM Address (MDCR_EL2_TDRA) * - OS related registers (MDCR_EL2_TDOSA) - * - Statistical profiler (MDCR_EL2_TPMS/MDCR_EL2_E2PB) * * Additionally, KVM only traps guest accesses to the debug registers if * the guest is not actively using them (see the KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY @@ -111,7 +110,6 @@ void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) */ vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 = __this_cpu_read(mdcr_el2) & MDCR_EL2_HPMN_MASK; vcpu->arch.mdcr_el2 |= (MDCR_EL2_TPM | - MDCR_EL2_TPMS | MDCR_EL2_TPMCR | MDCR_EL2_TDRA | MDCR_EL2_TDOSA); -- 2.21.0 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm