kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: maz@kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: arm/arm64: fold VHE entry/exit work into kvm_vcpu_run_vhe()
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 11:47:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200210114757.2889-1-mark.rutland@arm.com> (raw)

With VHE, running a vCPU always requires the sequence:

1. kvm_arm_vhe_guest_enter();
2. kvm_vcpu_run_vhe();
3. kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit()

... and as we invoke this from the shared arm/arm64 KVM code, 32-bit arm
has to provide stubs for all three functions.

To simplify the common code, and make it easier to make further
modifications to the arm64-specific portions in the near future, let's
fold kvm_arm_vhe_guest_enter() and kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit() into
kvm_vcpu_run_vhe().

The 32-bit stubs for kvm_arm_vhe_guest_enter() and
kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit() are removed, as they are no longer used. The
32-bit stub for kvm_vcpu_run_vhe() is left as-is.

There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
---
 arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h   |  3 ---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 32 --------------------------------
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c       | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                |  2 --
 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

Hi Marc,

This is a preparatory patch for the arm64 entry rework I'm doing: I need to
move the DAIF manipulation into the same function so that I can replace that
with a common DAIF+PMR save/restore sequence.

If it's possible to queue this patch for v5.6-rc*, it would help to minimize
conflict in the v5.7 merge window, and would be much appreciated.

I've tested this on a ThunderX2 machine atop v5.6-rc1 defconfig, booting the
host and running a test VM.

Thanks,
Mark.

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index c3314b286a61..a827b4d60d38 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -392,9 +392,6 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 static inline void kvm_vcpu_pmu_restore_host(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
 
-static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_enter(void) {}
-static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit(void) {}
-
 #define KVM_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN		-1
 #define KVM_BP_HARDEN_WA_NEEDED		0
 #define KVM_BP_HARDEN_NOT_REQUIRED	1
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index d87aa609d2b6..57fd46acd058 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -626,38 +626,6 @@ static inline void kvm_set_pmu_events(u32 set, struct perf_event_attr *attr) {}
 static inline void kvm_clr_pmu_events(u32 clr) {}
 #endif
 
-static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_enter(void)
-{
-	local_daif_mask();
-
-	/*
-	 * Having IRQs masked via PMR when entering the guest means the GIC
-	 * will not signal the CPU of interrupts of lower priority, and the
-	 * only way to get out will be via guest exceptions.
-	 * Naturally, we want to avoid this.
-	 *
-	 * local_daif_mask() already sets GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET, we just need a
-	 * dsb to ensure the redistributor is forwards EL2 IRQs to the CPU.
-	 */
-	pmr_sync();
-}
-
-static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit(void)
-{
-	/*
-	 * local_daif_restore() takes care to properly restore PSTATE.DAIF
-	 * and the GIC PMR if the host is using IRQ priorities.
-	 */
-	local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ);
-
-	/*
-	 * When we exit from the guest we change a number of CPU configuration
-	 * parameters, such as traps.  Make sure these changes take effect
-	 * before running the host or additional guests.
-	 */
-	isb();
-}
-
 #define KVM_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN		-1
 #define KVM_BP_HARDEN_WA_NEEDED		0
 #define KVM_BP_HARDEN_NOT_REQUIRED	1
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index dfe8dd172512..925086b46136 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -625,7 +625,7 @@ static void __hyp_text __pmu_switch_to_host(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
 }
 
 /* Switch to the guest for VHE systems running in EL2 */
-int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+static int __kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt;
 	struct kvm_cpu_context *guest_ctxt;
@@ -678,7 +678,42 @@ int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 
 	return exit_code;
 }
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kvm_vcpu_run_vhe);
+NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(__kvm_vcpu_run_vhe);
+
+int kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	local_daif_mask();
+
+	/*
+	 * Having IRQs masked via PMR when entering the guest means the GIC
+	 * will not signal the CPU of interrupts of lower priority, and the
+	 * only way to get out will be via guest exceptions.
+	 * Naturally, we want to avoid this.
+	 *
+	 * local_daif_mask() already sets GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET, we just need a
+	 * dsb to ensure the redistributor is forwards EL2 IRQs to the CPU.
+	 */
+	pmr_sync();
+
+	ret = __kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(vcpu);
+
+	/*
+	 * local_daif_restore() takes care to properly restore PSTATE.DAIF
+	 * and the GIC PMR if the host is using IRQ priorities.
+	 */
+	local_daif_restore(DAIF_PROCCTX_NOIRQ);
+
+	/*
+	 * When we exit from the guest we change a number of CPU configuration
+	 * parameters, such as traps.  Make sure these changes take effect
+	 * before running the host or additional guests.
+	 */
+	isb();
+
+	return ret;
+}
 
 /* Switch to the guest for legacy non-VHE systems */
 int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index d65a0faa46d8..eda7b624eab8 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -742,9 +742,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 		guest_enter_irqoff();
 
 		if (has_vhe()) {
-			kvm_arm_vhe_guest_enter();
 			ret = kvm_vcpu_run_vhe(vcpu);
-			kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit();
 		} else {
 			ret = kvm_call_hyp_ret(__kvm_vcpu_run_nvhe, vcpu);
 		}
-- 
2.11.0

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

             reply	other threads:[~2020-02-10 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-10 11:47 Mark Rutland [this message]
2020-02-17 14:41 ` [PATCH] kvm: arm/arm64: fold VHE entry/exit work into kvm_vcpu_run_vhe() Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200210114757.2889-1-mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).