From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362C9C35242 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB520206CC for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="wp/LuaXq" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EB520206CC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17A44AC83; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:53 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@kernel.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MwuIvJx7adO3; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDD14AECC; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FC040456 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:51 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGY02bb93mkK for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 445354A946 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78F65206CC; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581443567; bh=2syRWuDJzfIhjmeHULYOTlZtqJYdWIZ8ljebtdFDvB8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wp/LuaXqiT/UXN4ujliiqSWSxfUJHNoXMMZhWIP8qPeOZ97PnWgh5aniyzsMv33Sw KcYsDjK/qN88AtCWGBO27Zo6QvwPlaCTxD+tsp3lxg1OwJdOXoDKKE7/VXIoq/Kxlf v18T2whLoAhs2vv/qOqQMSiaBXxPQkLeNOYkqkc0= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j1Zfm-004O7k-Rb; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:50:11 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 30/94] KVM: arm64: nv: Configure HCR_EL2 for nested virtualization Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:48:34 +0000 Message-Id: <20200211174938.27809-31-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200211174938.27809-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20200211174938.27809-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Andre Przywara , Dave Martin X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu From: Jintack Lim We enable nested virtualization by setting the HCR NV and NV1 bit. When the virtual E2H bit is set, we can support EL2 register accesses via EL1 registers from the virtual EL2 by doing trap-and-emulate. A better alternative, however, is to allow the virtual EL2 to access EL2 register states without trap. This can be easily achieved by not traping EL1 registers since those registers already have EL2 register states. Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c index ae967e274e08..fd4085ebf062 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c @@ -151,9 +151,39 @@ static void __hyp_text __activate_traps(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_TX2_219_TVM)) hcr |= HCR_TVM; - /* Trap VM sysreg accesses if an EL2 guest is not using VHE. */ - if (vcpu_mode_el2(vcpu) && !vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu)) - hcr |= HCR_TVM | HCR_TRVM; + if (is_hyp_ctxt(vcpu)) { + hcr |= HCR_NV; + + if (!vcpu_el2_e2h_is_set(vcpu)) { + /* + * For a guest hypervisor on v8.0, trap and emulate + * the EL1 virtual memory control register accesses. + */ + hcr |= HCR_TVM | HCR_TRVM | HCR_NV1; + } else { + /* + * For a guest hypervisor on v8.1 (VHE), allow to + * access the EL1 virtual memory control registers + * natively. These accesses are to access EL2 register + * states. + * Note that we still need to respect the virtual + * HCR_EL2 state. + */ + u64 vhcr_el2 = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, HCR_EL2); + + /* + * We already set TVM to handle set/way cache maint + * ops traps, this somewhat collides with the nested + * virt trapping for nVHE. So turn this off for now + * here, in the hope that VHE guests won't ever do this. + * TODO: find out whether it's worth to support both + * cases at the same time. + */ + hcr &= ~HCR_TVM; + + hcr |= vhcr_el2 & (HCR_TVM | HCR_TRVM); + } + } write_sysreg(hcr, hcr_el2); -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm