kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] KVM: arm64: define our own swab32() to avoid a uapi static inline
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:58:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200220165839.256881-3-james.morse@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220165839.256881-1-james.morse@arm.com>

KVM uses swab32() when mediating GIC MMIO accesses if the GICV is badly
aligned, and the host and guest differ in endianness.

arm64 doesn't provide a __arch_swab32(), so __fswab32() is always backed
by the macro implementation that the compiler reduces to a single
instruction. But the static-inline causes problems for KVM if the compiler
chooses not to inline this function, it may not be located in the
__hyp_text where __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access() needs it.

Create our own __kvm_swab32() macro that calls ___constant_swab32()
directly. This way we know it will always be inlined.

Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h         | 7 +++++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
index a3a6a2ba9a63..fe57f60f06a8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
@@ -47,6 +47,13 @@
 #define read_sysreg_el2(r)	read_sysreg_elx(r, _EL2, _EL1)
 #define write_sysreg_el2(v,r)	write_sysreg_elx(v, r, _EL2, _EL1)
 
+/*
+ * Without an __arch_swab32(), we fall back to ___constant_swab32(), but the
+ * static inline can allow the compiler to out-of-line this. KVM always wants
+ * the macro version as its always inlined.
+ */
+#define __kvm_swab32(x)	___constant_swab32(x)
+
 int __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
 
 void __vgic_v3_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
index 29ee1feba4eb..4f3a087e36d5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/vgic-v2-cpuif-proxy.c
@@ -69,14 +69,14 @@ int __hyp_text __vgic_v2_perform_cpuif_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		u32 data = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, rd);
 		if (__is_be(vcpu)) {
 			/* guest pre-swabbed data, undo this for writel() */
-			data = swab32(data);
+			data = __kvm_swab32(data);
 		}
 		writel_relaxed(data, addr);
 	} else {
 		u32 data = readl_relaxed(addr);
 		if (__is_be(vcpu)) {
 			/* guest expects swabbed data */
-			data = swab32(data);
+			data = __kvm_swab32(data);
 		}
 		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, rd, data);
 	}
-- 
2.24.1

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-20 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20 16:58 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: arm64: Ask the compiler to __always_inline functions used by KVM at HYP James Morse
2020-02-20 16:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: arm64: Ask the compiler to __always_inline functions used " James Morse
2020-02-20 16:58 ` James Morse [this message]
2020-02-20 16:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Ask the compiler to __always_inline functions used by KVM " James Morse
2020-02-21 13:13   ` Will Deacon
2020-02-21 13:22     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-20 17:04 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: " Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-20 17:33   ` James Morse
2020-02-20 17:35     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-21 12:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-21 14:57   ` James Morse
2020-02-21 16:38     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-24 13:22   ` Andrew Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200220165839.256881-3-james.morse@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).