From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04887C3F2CE for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B947024658 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:02:54 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B947024658 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630054AF67; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:02:54 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pjmKVglqobvF; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:02:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389724AF58; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:02:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B254AEC2 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:02:51 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zjBerS9Hv7YB for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:02:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9144C4AF46 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:02:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2676531B; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:02:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from donnerap.cambridge.arm.com (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6AAD3F6C4; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:02:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 18:02:46 +0000 From: Andre Przywara To: Eric Auger Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support Message-ID: <20200304180246.20725ceb@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20200130112510.15154-5-eric.auger@redhat.com> References: <20200130112510.15154-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20200130112510.15154-5-eric.auger@redhat.com> Organization: ARM X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, andrew.murray@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, eric.auger.pro@gmail.com X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Archived-At: List-Archive: On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:25:05 +0100 Eric Auger wrote: Hi, > If event counters are implemented check the common events > required by the PMUv3 are implemented. > > Some are unconditionally required (SW_INCR, CPU_CYCLES, > either INST_RETIRED or INST_SPEC). Some others only are > required if the implementation implements some other features. > > Check those wich are unconditionally required. > > This test currently fails on TCG as neither INST_RETIRED > or INST_SPEC are supported. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger > > --- > > v1 -> v2: > - fix is_event_supported() > - fix boolean condition for PMU v4 > - fix PMCEID0 definition > > RFC ->v1: > - add a comment to explain the PMCEID0/1 splits > --- > arm/pmu.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arm/unittests.cfg | 6 +++++ > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c > index d24857e..4a26a76 100644 > --- a/arm/pmu.c > +++ b/arm/pmu.c > @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) > : [pmcr] "r" (pmcr), [z] "r" (0) > : "cc"); > } > + > +/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */ > +static void test_event_introspection(void) {} > + > #elif defined(__aarch64__) > #define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8 > #define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_MASK 0xf > @@ -139,6 +143,61 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) > : [pmcr] "r" (pmcr) > : "cc"); > } > + > +#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7) > + > +static bool is_event_supported(uint32_t n, bool warn) > +{ > + uint64_t pmceid0 = read_sysreg(pmceid0_el0); > + uint64_t pmceid1 = read_sysreg_s(PMCEID1_EL0); > + bool supported; > + uint64_t reg; > + > + /* > + * The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe > + * event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High > + * 32-bits describe support for extended events > + * starting at 0x4000, using the same split. > + */ > + if (n >= 0x0 && n <= 0x3F) > + reg = (pmceid0 & 0xFFFFFFFF) | ((pmceid1 & 0xFFFFFFFF) << 32); > + else if (n >= 0x4000 && n <= 0x403F) > + reg = (pmceid0 >> 32) | ((pmceid1 >> 32) << 32); > + else > + abort(); > + > + supported = reg & (1UL << (n & 0x3F)); > + > + if (!supported && warn) > + report_info("event %d is not supported", n); > + return supported; > +} > + > +static void test_event_introspection(void) > +{ > + bool required_events; > + > + if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { > + report_skip("No event counter, skip ..."); > + return; > + } > + > + /* PMUv3 requires an implementation includes some common events */ > + required_events = is_event_supported(0x0, true) /* SW_INCR */ && > + is_event_supported(0x11, true) /* CPU_CYCLES */ && > + (is_event_supported(0x8, true) /* INST_RETIRED */ || > + is_event_supported(0x1B, true) /* INST_PREC */); > + > + if (pmu.version == 0x4) { I think this should read >= 0x4, since those requirements are stacked on top of the prevision revision's requirements. Even better with some symbolic name. With that fixed: Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara Cheers, Andre > + /* ARMv8.1 PMU: STALL_FRONTEND and STALL_BACKEND are required */ > + required_events = required_events && > + is_event_supported(0x23, true) && > + is_event_supported(0x24, true); > + } > + > + report(required_events, "Check required events are implemented"); > +} > + > #endif > > /* > @@ -326,6 +385,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > "Monotonically increasing cycle count"); > report(check_cpi(cpi), "Cycle/instruction ratio"); > pmccntr64_test(); > + } else if (strcmp(argv[1], "event-introspection") == 0) { > + report_prefix_push(argv[1]); > + test_event_introspection(); > } else { > report_abort("Unknown sub-test '%s'", argv[1]); > } > diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg > index 79f0d7a..4433ef3 100644 > --- a/arm/unittests.cfg > +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg > @@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ file = pmu.flat > groups = pmu > extra_params = -append 'cycle-counter 0' > > +[pmu-event-introspection] > +file = pmu.flat > +groups = pmu > +arch = arm64 > +extra_params = -append 'event-introspection' > + > # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 > #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] > #file = pmu.flat _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm