KVM ARM Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, andre.przywara@arm.com,
	andrew.murray@arm.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	eric.auger.pro@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:04:59 +0100
Message-ID: <20200305090459.5hrrsf54zjxxoneq@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200130112510.15154-5-eric.auger@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:25:05PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> If event counters are implemented check the common events
> required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
> 
> Some are unconditionally required (SW_INCR, CPU_CYCLES,
> either INST_RETIRED or INST_SPEC). Some others only are
> required if the implementation implements some other features.
> 
> Check those wich are unconditionally required.
> 
> This test currently fails on TCG as neither INST_RETIRED
> or INST_SPEC are supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - fix is_event_supported()
> - fix boolean condition for PMU v4
> - fix PMCEID0 definition
> 
> RFC ->v1:
> - add a comment to explain the PMCEID0/1 splits
> ---
>  arm/pmu.c         | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arm/unittests.cfg |  6 +++++
>  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
> index d24857e..4a26a76 100644
> --- a/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)
>  	: [pmcr] "r" (pmcr), [z] "r" (0)
>  	: "cc");
>  }
> +
> +/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */
> +static void test_event_introspection(void) {}
> +
>  #elif defined(__aarch64__)
>  #define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8
>  #define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_MASK  0xf
> @@ -139,6 +143,61 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)
>  	: [pmcr] "r" (pmcr)
>  	: "cc");
>  }
> +
> +#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7)
> +
> +static bool is_event_supported(uint32_t n, bool warn)
> +{
> +	uint64_t pmceid0 = read_sysreg(pmceid0_el0);
> +	uint64_t pmceid1 = read_sysreg_s(PMCEID1_EL0);
> +	bool supported;
> +	uint64_t reg;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe
> +	 * event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High
> +	 * 32-bits describe support for extended events
> +	 * starting at 0x4000, using the same split.
> +	 */
> +	if (n >= 0x0  && n <= 0x3F)
> +		reg = (pmceid0 & 0xFFFFFFFF) | ((pmceid1 & 0xFFFFFFFF) << 32);

Maybe it's time to add

#define upper_32_bits(n) ((u32)(((n) >> 16) >> 16))
#define lower_32_bits(n) ((u32)(n))

to the kvm-unit-tests framework.

> +	else if  (n >= 0x4000 && n <= 0x403F)
> +		reg = (pmceid0 >> 32) | ((pmceid1 >> 32) << 32);
> +	else
> +		abort();

assert(0) ensure we get a dump_stack() (although I haven't fixed
dump_stack for arm64 yet...). Could also do the assert first

assert((n >= 0x0  && n <= 0x3F) || (n >= 0x4000 && n <= 0x403F))
if (n <= 0x3F)
 ...
else
 ...

What about defines for these hex numbers?


> +
> +	supported =  reg & (1UL << (n & 0x3F));
                   ^ extra space

> +
> +	if (!supported && warn)
> +		report_info("event %d is not supported", n);
> +	return supported;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_event_introspection(void)
> +{
> +	bool required_events;
> +
> +	if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) {
> +		report_skip("No event counter, skip ...");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* PMUv3 requires an implementation includes some common events */
> +	required_events = is_event_supported(0x0, true) /* SW_INCR */ &&
> +			  is_event_supported(0x11, true) /* CPU_CYCLES */ &&
> +			  (is_event_supported(0x8, true) /* INST_RETIRED */ ||
> +			   is_event_supported(0x1B, true) /* INST_PREC */);

If defines are created then the comments can go away

	required_events = is_event_supported(SW_INCR, true) &&
			  is_event_supported(CPU_CYCLES, true) &&
			  (is_event_supported(INST_RETIRED, true) ||
			   is_event_supported(INST_PREC, true));


> +
> +	if (pmu.version == 0x4) {
> +		/* ARMv8.1 PMU: STALL_FRONTEND and STALL_BACKEND are required */
> +		required_events = required_events &&
> +				  is_event_supported(0x23, true) &&
> +				  is_event_supported(0x24, true);
> +	}
> +
> +	report(required_events, "Check required events are implemented");
> +}
> +
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> @@ -326,6 +385,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  		       "Monotonically increasing cycle count");
>  		report(check_cpi(cpi), "Cycle/instruction ratio");
>  		pmccntr64_test();
> +	} else if (strcmp(argv[1], "event-introspection") == 0) {
> +		report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> +		test_event_introspection();

prefix pop

>  	} else {
>  		report_abort("Unknown sub-test '%s'", argv[1]);
>  	}
> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
> index 79f0d7a..4433ef3 100644
> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
> @@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ file = pmu.flat
>  groups = pmu
>  extra_params = -append 'cycle-counter 0'
>  
> +[pmu-event-introspection]
> +file = pmu.flat
> +groups = pmu
> +arch = arm64
> +extra_params = -append 'event-introspection'
> +
>  # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1
>  #[pmu-tcg-icount-1]
>  #file = pmu.flat
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
>

Thanks,
drew 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-30 11:25 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: arm64: PMUv3 Event Counter Tests Eric Auger
2020-01-30 11:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/9] arm64: Provide read/write_sysreg_s Eric Auger
2020-01-30 11:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/9] arm: pmu: Let pmu tests take a sub-test parameter Eric Auger
2020-03-04 18:01   ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-05  8:44   ` Andrew Jones
2020-01-30 11:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/9] arm: pmu: Add a pmu struct Eric Auger
2020-03-04 18:02   ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-04 18:21     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-05  8:53   ` Andrew Jones
2020-01-30 11:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support Eric Auger
2020-02-11 15:33   ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-11 18:08     ` Auger Eric
2020-02-11 16:28   ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-11 18:32     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 18:02   ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-05  9:04   ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2020-01-30 11:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/9] arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests Eric Auger
2020-02-11 16:27   ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-11 18:31     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-04 18:03   ` Andre Przywara
2020-03-05  9:33   ` Andrew Jones
2020-03-12 11:19     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-05  9:42   ` Andrew Jones
2020-03-12 11:16     ` Auger Eric
2020-01-30 11:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/9] arm: pmu: Test chained counter Eric Auger
2020-02-11 16:24   ` Peter Maydell
2020-02-11 18:30     ` Auger Eric
2020-03-05  9:37   ` Andrew Jones
2020-01-30 11:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/9] arm: pmu: test 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions Eric Auger
2020-03-05  9:50   ` Andrew Jones
2020-01-30 11:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 8/9] arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions Eric Auger
2020-03-05  9:55   ` Andrew Jones
2020-03-05 11:10     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-01-30 11:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 9/9] arm: pmu: Test overflow interrupts Eric Auger
2020-03-05 10:17   ` Andrew Jones
2020-02-11 15:42 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/9] KVM: arm64: PMUv3 Event Counter Tests Peter Maydell
2020-02-11 16:07   ` Andrew Jones
2020-02-11 18:23     ` Auger Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200305090459.5hrrsf54zjxxoneq@kamzik.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=eric.auger.pro@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

KVM ARM Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/0 kvmarm/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 kvmarm kvmarm/ https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm \
		kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
	public-inbox-index kvmarm

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/edu.columbia.cs.lists.kvmarm


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git