kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v6 18/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Add direct injection capability to SGI registers
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:24:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320182406.23465-19-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200320182406.23465-1-maz@kernel.org>

Most of the GICv3 emulation code that deals with SGIs now has to be
aware of the v4.1 capabilities in order to benefit from it.

Add such support, keyed on the interrupt having the hw flag set and
being a SGI.

Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-19-maz@kernel.org
---
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 27 ++++++++--
 virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c    | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
index ebc218840fc2..f4da9d1a6bff 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 #include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
 #include <linux/kvm.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <kvm/iodev.h>
 #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
 
@@ -257,8 +258,18 @@ static unsigned long vgic_v3_uaccess_read_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < len * 8; i++) {
 		struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
+		bool state = irq->pending_latch;
 
-		if (irq->pending_latch)
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			int err;
+
+			err = irq_get_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+						    IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+						    &state);
+			WARN_ON(err);
+		}
+
+		if (state)
 			value |= (1U << i);
 
 		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
@@ -942,8 +953,18 @@ void vgic_v3_dispatch_sgi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 reg, bool allow_group1)
 		 * generate interrupts of either group.
 		 */
 		if (!irq->group || allow_group1) {
-			irq->pending_latch = true;
-			vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq, flags);
+			if (!irq->hw) {
+				irq->pending_latch = true;
+				vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq, flags);
+			} else {
+				/* HW SGI? Ask the GIC to inject it */
+				int err;
+				err = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+							    IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+							    true);
+				WARN_RATELIMIT(err, "IRQ %d", irq->host_irq);
+				raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+			}
 		} else {
 			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 		}
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
index 97fb2a40e6ba..2199302597fa 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
 
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 #include <linux/bsearch.h>
+#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/kvm.h>
 #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
 #include <kvm/iodev.h>
@@ -59,6 +61,11 @@ unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_group(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return value;
 }
 
+static void vgic_update_vsgi(struct vgic_irq *irq)
+{
+	WARN_ON(its_prop_update_vsgi(irq->host_irq, irq->priority, irq->group));
+}
+
 void vgic_mmio_write_group(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t addr,
 			   unsigned int len, unsigned long val)
 {
@@ -71,7 +78,12 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_group(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t addr,
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 		irq->group = !!(val & BIT(i));
-		vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq, flags);
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			vgic_update_vsgi(irq);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+		} else {
+			vgic_queue_irq_unlock(vcpu->kvm, irq, flags);
+		}
 
 		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
 	}
@@ -113,7 +125,21 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_senable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
-		if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq)) {
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			if (!irq->enabled) {
+				struct irq_data *data;
+
+				irq->enabled = true;
+				data = &irq_to_desc(irq->host_irq)->irq_data;
+				while (irqd_irq_disabled(data))
+					enable_irq(irq->host_irq);
+			}
+
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+			vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+
+			continue;
+		} else if (vgic_irq_is_mapped_level(irq)) {
 			bool was_high = irq->line_level;
 
 			/*
@@ -148,6 +174,8 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_cenable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid) && irq->enabled)
+			disable_irq_nosync(irq->host_irq);
 
 		irq->enabled = false;
 
@@ -167,10 +195,22 @@ unsigned long vgic_mmio_read_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	for (i = 0; i < len * 8; i++) {
 		struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, intid + i);
 		unsigned long flags;
+		bool val;
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
-		if (irq_is_pending(irq))
-			value |= (1U << i);
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			int err;
+
+			val = false;
+			err = irq_get_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+						    IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+						    &val);
+			WARN_RATELIMIT(err, "IRQ %d", irq->host_irq);
+		} else {
+			val = irq_is_pending(irq);
+		}
+
+		value |= ((u32)val << i);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 
 		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
@@ -215,6 +255,21 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_spending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		}
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			/* HW SGI? Ask the GIC to inject it */
+			int err;
+			err = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+						    IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+						    true);
+			WARN_RATELIMIT(err, "IRQ %d", irq->host_irq);
+
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+			vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		if (irq->hw)
 			vgic_hw_irq_spending(vcpu, irq, is_uaccess);
 		else
@@ -269,6 +324,20 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_cpending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+			/* HW SGI? Ask the GIC to clear its pending bit */
+			int err;
+			err = irq_set_irqchip_state(irq->host_irq,
+						    IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING,
+						    false);
+			WARN_RATELIMIT(err, "IRQ %d", irq->host_irq);
+
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
+			vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
+
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		if (irq->hw)
 			vgic_hw_irq_cpending(vcpu, irq, is_uaccess);
 		else
@@ -318,8 +387,15 @@ static void vgic_mmio_change_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_irq *irq,
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 
-	if (irq->hw) {
+	if (irq->hw && !vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
 		vgic_hw_irq_change_active(vcpu, irq, active, !requester_vcpu);
+	} else if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid)) {
+		/*
+		 * GICv4.1 VSGI feature doesn't track an active state,
+		 * so let's not kid ourselves, there is nothing we can
+		 * do here.
+		 */
+		irq->active = false;
 	} else {
 		u32 model = vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model;
 		u8 active_source;
@@ -493,6 +569,8 @@ void vgic_mmio_write_priority(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 		/* Narrow the priority range to what we actually support */
 		irq->priority = (val >> (i * 8)) & GENMASK(7, 8 - VGIC_PRI_BITS);
+		if (irq->hw && vgic_irq_is_sgi(irq->intid))
+			vgic_update_vsgi(irq);
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
 
 		vgic_put_irq(vcpu->kvm, irq);
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-20 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-20 18:23 [PATCH v6 00/23] irqchip/gic-v4: GICv4.1 architecture support Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 01/23] irqchip/gic-v3: Use SGIs without active state if offered Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 02/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Skip absent CPUs while iterating over redistributors Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 03/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual exclusion between vPE affinity change and RD access Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 04/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Wait for completion of redistributor's INVALL operation Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 05/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual exclusion betwen invalidations on the same RD Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 06/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Advertise support v4.1 to KVM Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 07/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Map the ITS SGIR register page Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 08/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb skeletal VSGI irqchip Marc Zyngier
2020-03-24  2:27   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-24 12:14     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 09/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add initial SGI configuration Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 10/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb mask/unmask SGI callbacks Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 11/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb get/set_irqchip_state " Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 12/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Plumb set_vcpu_affinity " Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 13/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Move doorbell management to the GICv4 abstraction layer Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 14/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI allocation/teardown Marc Zyngier
2020-03-24  2:43   ` Zenghui Yu
2020-03-24 12:35     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 15/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Add VSGI property setup Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:23 ` [PATCH v6 16/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Eagerly vmap vPEs Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 17/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Let doorbells be auto-enabled Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:24 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-03-20 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 19/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow SGIs to switch between HW and SW interrupts Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 20/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Plumb SGI implementation selection in the distributor Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 21/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Reload VLPI configuration on distributor enable/disable Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 22/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Allow non-trapping WFI when using HW SGIs Marc Zyngier
2020-03-20 18:24 ` [PATCH v6 23/23] KVM: arm64: GICv4.1: Expose HW-based SGIs in debugfs Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200320182406.23465-19-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).