From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7A0C433E0 for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 10:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B1B206D5 for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 10:11:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 81B1B206D5 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9C14B101; Sun, 17 May 2020 06:11:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x8DbvU5fozLu; Sun, 17 May 2020 06:11:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A174B11C; Sun, 17 May 2020 06:11:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB644B10B for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 06:11:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id khMC47Z836TN for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 06:11:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.191]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C114B0FE for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 06:11:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 2215CAA0C3E83D9B1840; Sun, 17 May 2020 18:11:24 +0800 (CST) Received: from DESKTOP-FPN2511.china.huawei.com (10.173.222.58) by DGGEMS413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.213) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Sun, 17 May 2020 18:11:13 +0800 From: Jingyi Wang To: , , , Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/6] arm64: microbench: get correct ipi recieved num Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 18:08:55 +0800 Message-ID: <20200517100900.30792-2-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20200517100900.30792-1-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> References: <20200517100900.30792-1-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.173.222.58] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: maz@kernel.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu If ipi_exec() fails because of timeout, we shouldn't increase the number of ipi received. Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang --- arm/micro-bench.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c index 4612f41..ca022d9 100644 --- a/arm/micro-bench.c +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c @@ -103,7 +103,9 @@ static void ipi_exec(void) while (!ipi_received && tries--) cpu_relax(); - ++received; + if (ipi_recieved) + ++received; + assert_msg(ipi_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received %d successfully\n", received); } -- 2.19.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm