kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	shan.gavin@gmail.com, maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 5/9] kvm/arm64: Replace hsr with esr
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 11:45:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200526104507.GC1363@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200508032919.52147-6-gshan@redhat.com>

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 01:29:15PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> This replace the variable names to make them self-explaining. The
> tracepoint isn't changed accordingly because they're part of ABI:
> 
>    * @hsr to @esr
>    * @hsr_ec to @ec
>    * Use kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class() helper if possible
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>

As with patch 3, I think this cleanup makes sense independent from the
rest of the series, and I think it'd make sense to bundle all the
patches renaming hsr -> esr, and send those as a preparatory series.

Thanks,
Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c  |  9 ++++-----
>  arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c    | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> index 00858db82a64..e3b3dcd5b811 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
> @@ -123,13 +123,13 @@ static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>   */
>  static int kvm_handle_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  {
> -	u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> +	u32 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DEBUG;
> -	run->debug.arch.hsr = hsr;
> +	run->debug.arch.hsr = esr;
>  
> -	switch (ESR_ELx_EC(hsr)) {
> +	switch (kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(esr)) {
>  	case ESR_ELx_EC_WATCHPT_LOW:
>  		run->debug.arch.far = vcpu->arch.fault.far_el2;
>  		/* fall through */
> @@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ static int kvm_handle_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  	case ESR_ELx_EC_BRK64:
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		kvm_err("%s: un-handled case hsr: %#08x\n",
> -			__func__, (unsigned int) hsr);
> +		kvm_err("%s: un-handled case esr: %#08x\n",
> +			__func__, (unsigned int)esr);
>  		ret = -1;
>  		break;
>  	}
> @@ -150,10 +150,10 @@ static int kvm_handle_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  
>  static int kvm_handle_unknown_ec(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  {
> -	u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> +	u32 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
>  
> -	kvm_pr_unimpl("Unknown exception class: hsr: %#08x -- %s\n",
> -		      hsr, esr_get_class_string(hsr));
> +	kvm_pr_unimpl("Unknown exception class: esr: %#08x -- %s\n",
> +		      esr, esr_get_class_string(esr));
>  
>  	kvm_inject_undefined(vcpu);
>  	return 1;
> @@ -230,10 +230,10 @@ static exit_handle_fn arm_exit_handlers[] = {
>  
>  static exit_handle_fn kvm_get_exit_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> -	u8 hsr_ec = ESR_ELx_EC(hsr);
> +	u32 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> +	u8 ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(esr);
>  
> -	return arm_exit_handlers[hsr_ec];
> +	return arm_exit_handlers[ec];
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -273,15 +273,15 @@ int handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run,
>  {
>  	if (ARM_SERROR_PENDING(exception_index)) {
>  		u32 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> -		u8 hsr_ec = ESR_ELx_EC(esr);
> +		u8 ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(esr);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * HVC/SMC already have an adjusted PC, which we need
>  		 * to correct in order to return to after having
>  		 * injected the SError.
>  		 */
> -		if (hsr_ec == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32 || hsr_ec == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64 ||
> -		    hsr_ec == ESR_ELx_EC_SMC32 || hsr_ec == ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64) {
> +		if (ec == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC32 || ec == ESR_ELx_EC_HVC64 ||
> +		    ec == ESR_ELx_EC_SMC32 || ec == ESR_ELx_EC_SMC64) {
>  			u32 adj =  kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(esr) ? 4 : 2;
>  			*vcpu_pc(vcpu) -= adj;
>  		}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 369f22f49f3d..7bf4840bf90e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -356,8 +356,8 @@ static bool __hyp_text __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  static bool __hyp_text __hyp_handle_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	u32 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> +	u8 ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(esr);
>  	bool vhe, sve_guest, sve_host;
> -	u8 hsr_ec;
>  
>  	if (!system_supports_fpsimd())
>  		return false;
> @@ -372,14 +372,13 @@ static bool __hyp_text __hyp_handle_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		vhe = has_vhe();
>  	}
>  
> -	hsr_ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(esr);
> -	if (hsr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD &&
> -	    hsr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_SVE)
> +	if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD &&
> +	    ec != ESR_ELx_EC_SVE)
>  		return false;
>  
>  	/* Don't handle SVE traps for non-SVE vcpus here: */
>  	if (!sve_guest)
> -		if (hsr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD)
> +		if (ec != ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD)
>  			return false;
>  
>  	/* Valid trap.  Switch the context: */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 012fff834a4b..58f81ab519af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -2182,10 +2182,10 @@ static void unhandled_cp_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  				struct sys_reg_params *params)
>  {
>  	u32 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> -	u8 hsr_ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(esr);
> +	u8 ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(esr);
>  	int cp = -1;
>  
> -	switch(hsr_ec) {
> +	switch (ec) {
>  	case ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_32:
>  	case ESR_ELx_EC_CP15_64:
>  		cp = 15;
> @@ -2216,17 +2216,17 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			    size_t nr_specific)
>  {
>  	struct sys_reg_params params;
> -	u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> -	int Rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(hsr);
> -	int Rt2 = (hsr >> 10) & 0x1f;
> +	u32 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> +	int Rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(esr);
> +	int Rt2 = (esr >> 10) & 0x1f;
>  
>  	params.is_aarch32 = true;
>  	params.is_32bit = false;
> -	params.CRm = (hsr >> 1) & 0xf;
> -	params.is_write = ((hsr & 1) == 0);
> +	params.CRm = (esr >> 1) & 0xf;
> +	params.is_write = ((esr & 1) == 0);
>  
>  	params.Op0 = 0;
> -	params.Op1 = (hsr >> 16) & 0xf;
> +	params.Op1 = (esr >> 16) & 0xf;
>  	params.Op2 = 0;
>  	params.CRn = 0;
>  
> @@ -2273,18 +2273,18 @@ static int kvm_handle_cp_32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			    size_t nr_specific)
>  {
>  	struct sys_reg_params params;
> -	u32 hsr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> -	int Rt  = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(hsr);
> +	u32 esr = kvm_vcpu_get_esr(vcpu);
> +	int Rt = kvm_vcpu_sys_get_rt(esr);
>  
>  	params.is_aarch32 = true;
>  	params.is_32bit = true;
> -	params.CRm = (hsr >> 1) & 0xf;
> +	params.CRm = (esr >> 1) & 0xf;
>  	params.regval = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, Rt);
> -	params.is_write = ((hsr & 1) == 0);
> -	params.CRn = (hsr >> 10) & 0xf;
> +	params.is_write = ((esr & 1) == 0);
> +	params.CRn = (esr >> 10) & 0xf;
>  	params.Op0 = 0;
> -	params.Op1 = (hsr >> 14) & 0x7;
> -	params.Op2 = (hsr >> 17) & 0x7;
> +	params.Op1 = (esr >> 14) & 0x7;
> +	params.Op2 = (esr >> 17) & 0x7;
>  
>  	if (!emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, target_specific, nr_specific) ||
>  	    !emulate_cp(vcpu, &params, global, nr_global)) {
> -- 
> 2.23.0
> 
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-08  3:29 [PATCH RFCv2 0/9] kvm/arm64: Support Async Page Fault Gavin Shan
2020-05-08  3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 1/9] arm64: Probe for the presence of KVM hypervisor services during boot Gavin Shan
2020-05-08  3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 2/9] arm/arm64: KVM: Advertise KVM UID to guests via SMCCC Gavin Shan
2020-05-08  3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 3/9] kvm/arm64: Rename kvm_vcpu_get_hsr() to kvm_vcpu_get_esr() Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 10:42   ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27  2:43     ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27  7:20       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-28  6:34         ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08  3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 4/9] kvm/arm64: Detach ESR operator from vCPU struct Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 10:51   ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27  2:55     ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08  3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 5/9] kvm/arm64: Replace hsr with esr Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 10:45   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2020-05-27  2:56     ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08  3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 6/9] kvm/arm64: Export kvm_handle_user_mem_abort() with prefault mode Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 10:58   ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27  3:01     ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08  3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 7/9] kvm/arm64: Support async page fault Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 12:34   ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27  4:05     ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27  7:37       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-28  6:32         ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-08  3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 8/9] kernel/sched: Add cpu_rq_is_locked() Gavin Shan
2020-05-08  3:29 ` [PATCH RFCv2 9/9] arm64: Support async page fault Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 12:56   ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27  6:48   ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28  6:14     ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-28  7:03       ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-28 10:53         ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28 10:48       ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-28 23:02         ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-29  9:41           ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-29 11:11             ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-31 12:44               ` Marc Zyngier
2020-06-01  9:21                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-06-02  5:44                   ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-25 23:39 ` [PATCH RFCv2 0/9] kvm/arm64: Support Async Page Fault Gavin Shan
2020-05-26 13:09 ` Mark Rutland
2020-05-27  2:39   ` Gavin Shan
2020-05-27  7:48     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-05-27 16:10       ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200526104507.GC1363@C02TD0UTHF1T.local \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).