From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D89C433E1 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 03:02:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFD720890 for ; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 03:02:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2EFD720890 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9716A4B598; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:02:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OWd1cnbFIqqi; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:02:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A298A4B569; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:02:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C9F4B571 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:02:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O5L+O98w0MPX for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:02:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF3E34B56A for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 23:02:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 56DD46A6489F87F95C66; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:02:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from DESKTOP-FPN2511.china.huawei.com (10.174.187.42) by DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.487.0; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:02:20 +0800 From: Jingyi Wang To: , , Subject: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/8] arm64: microbench: get correct ipi received num Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:01:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20200702030132.20252-2-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.1.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20200702030132.20252-1-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> References: <20200702030132.20252-1-wangjingyi11@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.174.187.42] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Cc: maz@kernel.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu If ipi_exec() fails because of timeout, we shouldn't increase the number of ipi received. Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang --- arm/micro-bench.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arm/micro-bench.c b/arm/micro-bench.c index 4612f41..794dfac 100644 --- a/arm/micro-bench.c +++ b/arm/micro-bench.c @@ -103,7 +103,9 @@ static void ipi_exec(void) while (!ipi_received && tries--) cpu_relax(); - ++received; + if (ipi_received) + ++received; + assert_msg(ipi_received, "failed to receive IPI in time, but received %d successfully\n", received); } -- 2.19.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm