kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: maz@kernel.org, will@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 03/16] KVM: arm64: Hide SPE from guests
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 17:26:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201027172705.15181-4-alexandru.elisei@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201027172705.15181-1-alexandru.elisei@arm.com>

When SPE is not implemented, accesses to the SPE registers cause an
undefined exception. KVM advertises the presence of SPE in the
ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 register, but configures MDCR_EL2 to trap accesses to the
registers and injects an undefined exception when that happens.

The architecture doesn't allow trapping access to the PMBIDR_EL1 register,
which means the guest will be able to read it even if SPE is not advertised
in the ID register. However, since it's usually better for a read to
unexpectedly succeed than to cause an exception, let's stop advertising the
presence of SPE to guests to better match how KVM emulates the
architecture.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index d9117bc56237..aa776c006a2a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -244,6 +244,12 @@ static bool access_vm_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return true;
 }
 
+static unsigned int spe_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				   const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+	return REG_HIDDEN_GUEST | REG_HIDDEN_USER;
+}
+
 static bool access_actlr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			 struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
@@ -1143,6 +1149,8 @@ static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		val = cpuid_feature_cap_perfmon_field(val,
 						ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT,
 						ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_8_1);
+		/* Don't advertise SPE to guests */
+		val &= ~(0xfUL << ID_AA64DFR0_PMSVER_SHIFT);
 	} else if (id == SYS_ID_DFR0_EL1) {
 		/* Limit guests to PMUv3 for ARMv8.1 */
 		val = cpuid_feature_cap_perfmon_field(val,
@@ -1590,6 +1598,17 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_FAR_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, FAR_EL1 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PAR_EL1), NULL, reset_unknown, PAR_EL1 },
 
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMSCR_EL1), .visibility = spe_visibility },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMSICR_EL1), .visibility = spe_visibility },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMSIRR_EL1), .visibility = spe_visibility },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMSFCR_EL1), .visibility = spe_visibility },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMSEVFR_EL1), .visibility = spe_visibility },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMSLATFR_EL1), .visibility = spe_visibility },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMSIDR_EL1), .visibility = spe_visibility },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMBLIMITR_EL1), .visibility = spe_visibility },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMBPTR_EL1), .visibility = spe_visibility },
+	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMBSR_EL1), .visibility = spe_visibility },
+
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMINTENSET_EL1), access_pminten, reset_unknown, PMINTENSET_EL1 },
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PMINTENCLR_EL1), access_pminten, reset_unknown, PMINTENSET_EL1 },
 
-- 
2.29.1

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-27 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-27 17:26 [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] KVM: arm64: Add Statistical Profiling Extension (SPE) support Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/16] KVM: arm64: Initialize VCPU mdcr_el2 before loading it Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-19 16:58   ` James Morse
2020-12-02 14:25     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] dt-bindings: ARM SPE: Highlight the need for PPI partitions on heterogeneous systems Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` Alexandru Elisei [this message]
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/16] arm64: Introduce CPU SPE feature Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-19 16:58   ` James Morse
2020-12-02 14:29     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-12-02 17:23       ` Will Deacon
2020-12-03 10:07         ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] KVM: arm64: Introduce VCPU " Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/16] KVM: arm64: Introduce SPE primitives Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-19 16:58   ` James Morse
2020-12-02 15:13     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/16] KVM: arm64: Define SPE data structure for each VCPU Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/16] KVM: arm64: Add a new VCPU device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-05  9:58   ` Haibo Xu
2020-12-02 15:20     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-19 16:58   ` James Morse
2020-12-02 16:28     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/16] KVM: arm64: Use separate function for the mapping size in user_mem_abort() Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-05 10:01   ` Haibo Xu
2020-12-02 16:29     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:26 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/16] KVM: arm64: Add a new VM device control group for SPE Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-05 10:10   ` Haibo Xu
2020-12-02 16:35     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-11-19 16:59   ` James Morse
2021-03-23 14:27     ` Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/16] KVM: arm64: Add SPE system registers to VCPU context Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/16] KVM: arm64: VHE: Clear MDCR_EL2.E2PB in vcpu_put() Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/16] KVM: arm64: Switch SPE context on VM entry/exit Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/16] KVM: arm64: Emulate SPE buffer management interrupt Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/16] KVM: arm64: Enable SPE for guests Alexandru Elisei
2020-10-27 17:27 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/16] Documentation: arm64: Document ARM Neoverse-N1 erratum #1688567 Alexandru Elisei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201027172705.15181-4-alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --to=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).