From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9441C433FE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547B561100 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 13:11:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 547B561100 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F5B4B1B4; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:11:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i1L1hDpftzwJ; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:11:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FD54B165; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:11:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E2A4064F for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:22:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mK3Y8EYp-Fr3 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:22:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-qk1-f202.google.com (mail-qk1-f202.google.com [209.85.222.202]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55D5F4048A for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:22:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk1-f202.google.com with SMTP id k12-20020a05620a0b8c00b003d5c8646ec2so4083255qkh.20 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:22:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Q20iEess0fifQ1UuQbXOXFqiUUzry/ZTlIcm76UAWxM=; b=JfW08WvwR5NppuckDbGBjuYm/qfKFPNTAZMbHjE/W+axyhP3dc87K2dMjwCziGbrNR 5Qhg0J8NmGL98SrOSvD9+8fWKrNBvaBv4Bb712hBTDXdcAkjRaecIZM3yTmnh/YCLd1j j4567Vp0WodpV5fuJ38h92olkRvx4Hh61wgCKUVTrypmncIQgF7Ri1gQk00SQi/HSyow FU9+od8W/IBrgXjkjHAVl9RVO+lIOxAvuEQlvTwimT1f12eK4eJcULYfQ+OhzITQA4SX BCUUCMylJy5CnztKQ+q2PhL/PAPjBBJ/v0LuXubz46t0KKEapi2MizSOXqYgukZgXHs/ NGAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:subject :from:to:cc; bh=Q20iEess0fifQ1UuQbXOXFqiUUzry/ZTlIcm76UAWxM=; b=f2KnW9UChal0xTdk5oR4T0Erz87FTiVRoExONby4WoK05uaAFExXSDdCqaLXgGTHfR d4iBUQJR73Intrt5n+f0QFow0t9KywD/sZAmXwM5ZsivdiNg9vZad7Y+rwYtHD3sFaJ7 qv+0+vf15JhePERo6TUBKCKpTFPA3ZafW5oB97I6BdjWW5F+PSKI0zXaTidGnuQQmCok bcWlPMTaVP+ZLKBhgmxzSEPfsYsfilYHIRTOVdqKNfBfQU0P6Nn91I96kbG4AJGE5zqP Jtp6FXrzABChYHG/MUGBFwOM9QMMpAjIpbbFmgEXTv26TUPB2UFXVuQ2j+PXUiCxNQnj jfEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fnn+hRdSTW1HRX6ohJq/25S9D98MPW+iJCmG8DpktYQSq6K4v UQmUZ1pwTpSdhc5ExuuMzhQnhu/B4yw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWLleGn2Q9uDNlTmU74iPlGeJ9AoH7VeL2KdOBb7ybZB1A31L8xwxPOwizMhE7GlKn0cZbRD9sBg8= X-Received: from seanjc798194.pdx.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:90:200:b022:92d6:d37b:686c]) (user=seanjc job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:ea51:: with SMTP id o17mr38809433ybe.192.1632262957862; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:22:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:22:29 -0700 Message-Id: <20210921222231.518092-1-seanjc@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0.464.g1972c5931b-goog Subject: [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Clean up CONFIG_KVM vs CONFIG_HAVE_KVM From: Sean Christopherson To: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:11:52 -0400 Cc: Sean Christopherson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sean Christopherson List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Fix an oddity where arm64 can end up with KVM=y and HAVE_KVM=n. This doesn't cause problems today as no generic code that supports arm64 uses HAVE_KVM, but that may not always be the case, e.g. I stumbled across this when exploring hiding perf's guest callbacks behind HAVE_KVM=y. Sean Christopherson (2): KVM: arm64: Unconditionally include generic KVM's Kconfig KVM: arm64: Depend on HAVE_KVM => OF instead of directly on OF arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 9 ++------- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.33.0.464.g1972c5931b-goog _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm