kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/7] KVM: x86: Report host tsc and realtime values in KVM_GET_CLOCK
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 15:53:43 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210928185343.GA97247@fuller.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210916181538.968978-5-oupton@google.com>

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 06:15:35PM +0000, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Handling the migration of TSCs correctly is difficult, in part because
> Linux does not provide userspace with the ability to retrieve a (TSC,
> realtime) clock pair for a single instant in time. In lieu of a more
> convenient facility, KVM can report similar information in the kvm_clock
> structure.
> 
> Provide userspace with a host TSC & realtime pair iff the realtime clock
> is based on the TSC. If userspace provides KVM_SET_CLOCK with a valid
> realtime value, advance the KVM clock by the amount of elapsed time. Do
> not step the KVM clock backwards, though, as it is a monotonic
> oscillator.
> 
> Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst  | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 +++
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h        |  7 +++++-
>  4 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index a6729c8cf063..d0b9c986cf6c 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -993,20 +993,34 @@ such as migration.
>  When KVM_CAP_ADJUST_CLOCK is passed to KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION, it returns the
>  set of bits that KVM can return in struct kvm_clock_data's flag member.
>  
> -The only flag defined now is KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE.  If set, the returned
> -value is the exact kvmclock value seen by all VCPUs at the instant
> -when KVM_GET_CLOCK was called.  If clear, the returned value is simply
> -CLOCK_MONOTONIC plus a constant offset; the offset can be modified
> -with KVM_SET_CLOCK.  KVM will try to make all VCPUs follow this clock,
> -but the exact value read by each VCPU could differ, because the host
> -TSC is not stable.
> +FLAGS:
> +
> +KVM_CLOCK_TSC_STABLE.  If set, the returned value is the exact kvmclock
> +value seen by all VCPUs at the instant when KVM_GET_CLOCK was called.
> +If clear, the returned value is simply CLOCK_MONOTONIC plus a constant
> +offset; the offset can be modified with KVM_SET_CLOCK.  KVM will try
> +to make all VCPUs follow this clock, but the exact value read by each
> +VCPU could differ, because the host TSC is not stable.
> +
> +KVM_CLOCK_REALTIME.  If set, the `realtime` field in the kvm_clock_data
> +structure is populated with the value of the host's real time
> +clocksource at the instant when KVM_GET_CLOCK was called. If clear,
> +the `realtime` field does not contain a value.
> +
> +KVM_CLOCK_HOST_TSC.  If set, the `host_tsc` field in the kvm_clock_data
> +structure is populated with the value of the host's timestamp counter (TSC)
> +at the instant when KVM_GET_CLOCK was called. If clear, the `host_tsc` field
> +does not contain a value.

If the host TSCs are not stable, then KVM_CLOCK_HOST_TSC bit (and
host_tsc field) are ambiguous. Shouldnt exposing them be conditional on 
stable TSC for the host ?

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-28 18:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16 18:15 [PATCH v8 0/7] KVM: x86: Add idempotent controls for migrating system counter state Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] kvm: x86: abstract locking around pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] KVM: x86: extract KVM_GET_CLOCK/KVM_SET_CLOCK to separate functions Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] KVM: x86: Fix potential race in KVM_GET_CLOCK Oliver Upton
2021-09-29 13:33   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] KVM: x86: Report host tsc and realtime values " Oliver Upton
2021-09-28 18:53   ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2021-09-29 11:20     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-29 18:56   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-09-30 19:21     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-09-30 23:02       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 12:05         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 12:10           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 19:59           ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-10-01 21:03             ` Oliver Upton
2021-10-01 14:17         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-01 14:39   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-01 14:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-01 15:39       ` Oliver Upton
2021-10-01 16:42         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] kvm: x86: protect masterclock with a seqcount Oliver Upton
2021-09-24 16:42   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-30 17:51   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 16:48   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] KVM: x86: Refactor tsc synchronization code Oliver Upton
2021-09-16 18:15 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] KVM: x86: Expose TSC offset controls to userspace Oliver Upton
2021-09-30 19:14   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01  9:17     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-01 10:32       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 15:12         ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-01 19:11           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-01 19:33             ` Oliver Upton
2021-10-04 14:30               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2021-10-04 11:44             ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-10-05 15:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-02-23 10:02   ` David Woodhouse
2021-09-24 16:43 ` [PATCH v8 0/7] KVM: x86: Add idempotent controls for migrating system counter state Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210928185343.GA97247@fuller.cnet \
    --to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).