From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC3FC433FE for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286284B4D7; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 03:21:15 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@redhat.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OIih7lpIVtss; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 03:21:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0839A4B274; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 03:21:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB01849F51 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 03:21:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-5aNvBuBnoZ for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 03:21:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EA940BEE for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 03:21:11 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1665732071; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DdHs0tIGZs6Hd5dMAbgHdexs9jDtMkST+MADKDSgxqM=; b=as9BqTSWqng7mobUeUjwKK2LPHGo15/KchleXMVJYqlFE3blFjUz6K55/8zCZ3k0dENeib HknrQHUQT8EA0I05SYNISAVd6NIA8NzzSJt9oZWBhcavTELpHTeqdBy41qZbTGg70dpTpp EDA9NOEWLMAZLcTNjfFRfD/1Sa7HhE4= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-297-V9TD_DjrPUuoIF-FNHa4xw-1; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 03:21:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: V9TD_DjrPUuoIF-FNHa4xw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A88133C0F446; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gshan.redhat.com (vpn2-54-52.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.52]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60002C47DEC; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:19:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Gavin Shan To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:19:11 +0800 Message-Id: <20221014071914.227134-4-gshan@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com> References: <20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com, shuah@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, ajones@ventanamicro.com X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu prepare_vm() is called in every iteration and run. The allowed memory slots (KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) are probed for multiple times. It's not free and unnecessary. Move the probing logic for the allowed memory slots to parse_args() for once, which is upper layer of prepare_vm(). No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 29 ++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index dcb492b3f27b..d5aa9148f96f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -245,27 +245,17 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, void *guest_code, uint64_t mempages, struct timespec *slot_runtime) { - uint32_t max_mem_slots; uint64_t rempages; uint64_t guest_addr; uint32_t slot; struct timespec tstart; struct sync_area *sync; - max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS); - TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 1, - "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1"); - TEST_ASSERT(nslots > 1 || nslots == -1, - "Slot count cap should be greater than 1"); - if (nslots != -1) - max_mem_slots = min(max_mem_slots, (uint32_t)nslots); - pr_info_v("Allowed number of memory slots: %"PRIu32"\n", max_mem_slots); - TEST_ASSERT(mempages > 1, "Can't test without any memory"); data->npages = mempages; - data->nslots = max_mem_slots - 1; + data->nslots = nslots; data->pages_per_slot = mempages / data->nslots; if (!data->pages_per_slot) { *maxslots = mempages + 1; @@ -885,8 +875,8 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[], break; case 's': targs->nslots = atoi(optarg); - if (targs->nslots <= 0 && targs->nslots != -1) { - pr_info("Slot count cap has to be positive or -1 for no cap\n"); + if (targs->nslots <= 1 && targs->nslots != -1) { + pr_info("Slot count cap must be larger than 1 or -1 for no cap\n"); return false; } break; @@ -932,6 +922,19 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[], return false; } + /* Memory slot 0 is reserved */ + if (targs->nslots == -1) { + targs->nslots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) - 1; + if (targs->nslots < 1) { + pr_info("KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1\n"); + return false; + } + } else { + targs->nslots--; + } + + pr_info_v("Number of memory slots: %d\n", targs->nslots); + return true; } -- 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B38E77B for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:21:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1665732071; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DdHs0tIGZs6Hd5dMAbgHdexs9jDtMkST+MADKDSgxqM=; b=as9BqTSWqng7mobUeUjwKK2LPHGo15/KchleXMVJYqlFE3blFjUz6K55/8zCZ3k0dENeib HknrQHUQT8EA0I05SYNISAVd6NIA8NzzSJt9oZWBhcavTELpHTeqdBy41qZbTGg70dpTpp EDA9NOEWLMAZLcTNjfFRfD/1Sa7HhE4= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-297-V9TD_DjrPUuoIF-FNHa4xw-1; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 03:21:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: V9TD_DjrPUuoIF-FNHa4xw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A88133C0F446; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gshan.redhat.com (vpn2-54-52.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.52]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60002C47DEC; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 07:19:54 +0000 (UTC) From: Gavin Shan To: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, peterx@redhat.com, maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com Subject: [PATCH 3/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Probe memory slots for once Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 15:19:11 +0800 Message-ID: <20221014071914.227134-4-gshan@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com> References: <20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 Message-ID: <20221014071911.h_nRwWYiJ8Ta0WRAEEphEALFGqzDsd3qPpVg7fVElWs@z> prepare_vm() is called in every iteration and run. The allowed memory slots (KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) are probed for multiple times. It's not free and unnecessary. Move the probing logic for the allowed memory slots to parse_args() for once, which is upper layer of prepare_vm(). No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan --- .../testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c | 29 ++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c index dcb492b3f27b..d5aa9148f96f 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_perf_test.c @@ -245,27 +245,17 @@ static bool prepare_vm(struct vm_data *data, int nslots, uint64_t *maxslots, void *guest_code, uint64_t mempages, struct timespec *slot_runtime) { - uint32_t max_mem_slots; uint64_t rempages; uint64_t guest_addr; uint32_t slot; struct timespec tstart; struct sync_area *sync; - max_mem_slots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS); - TEST_ASSERT(max_mem_slots > 1, - "KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1"); - TEST_ASSERT(nslots > 1 || nslots == -1, - "Slot count cap should be greater than 1"); - if (nslots != -1) - max_mem_slots = min(max_mem_slots, (uint32_t)nslots); - pr_info_v("Allowed number of memory slots: %"PRIu32"\n", max_mem_slots); - TEST_ASSERT(mempages > 1, "Can't test without any memory"); data->npages = mempages; - data->nslots = max_mem_slots - 1; + data->nslots = nslots; data->pages_per_slot = mempages / data->nslots; if (!data->pages_per_slot) { *maxslots = mempages + 1; @@ -885,8 +875,8 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[], break; case 's': targs->nslots = atoi(optarg); - if (targs->nslots <= 0 && targs->nslots != -1) { - pr_info("Slot count cap has to be positive or -1 for no cap\n"); + if (targs->nslots <= 1 && targs->nslots != -1) { + pr_info("Slot count cap must be larger than 1 or -1 for no cap\n"); return false; } break; @@ -932,6 +922,19 @@ static bool parse_args(int argc, char *argv[], return false; } + /* Memory slot 0 is reserved */ + if (targs->nslots == -1) { + targs->nslots = kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS) - 1; + if (targs->nslots < 1) { + pr_info("KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS should be greater than 1\n"); + return false; + } + } else { + targs->nslots--; + } + + pr_info_v("Number of memory slots: %d\n", targs->nslots); + return true; } -- 2.23.0