From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Removing support for 32bit KVM/arm host
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 14:38:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a984189-78bb-2707-3714-13edcee9e8f5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f7f3b6c8b758b6d2134364616c6bc1e@kernel.org>
On 20/02/2020 2:01 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-02-20 13:32, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 20/02/2020 1:15 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Hi Marek,
>>>
>>> On 2020-02-20 12:44, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> Hi Marc,
>>>>
>>>> On 10.02.2020 15:13, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>> KVM/arm was merged just over 7 years ago, and has lived a very quiet
>>>>> life so far. It mostly works if you're prepared to deal with its
>>>>> limitations, it has been a good prototype for the arm64 version,
>>>>> but it suffers a few problems:
>>>>>
>>>>> - It is incomplete (no debug support, no PMU)
>>>>> - It hasn't followed any of the architectural evolutions
>>>>> - It has zero users (I don't count myself here)
>>>>> - It is more and more getting in the way of new arm64 developments
>>>>
>>>> That is a bit sad information. Mainline Exynos finally got everything
>>>> that was needed to run it on the quite popular Samsung Exynos5422-based
>>>> Odroid XU4/HC1/MC1 boards. According to the Odroid related forums it is
>>>> being used. We also use it internally at Samsung.
>>>
>>> Something like "too little, too late" springs to mind, but let's be
>>> constructive. Is anyone using it in a production environment, where
>>> they rely on the latest mainline kernel having KVM support?
>>>
>>> The current proposal is to still have KVM support in 5.6, as well as
>>> ongoing support for stable kernels. If that's not enough, can you please
>>> explain your precise use case?
>>
>> Presumably there's no *technical* reason why the stable subset of v7
>> support couldn't be stripped down and brought back private to arch/arm
>> if somebody really wants and is willing to step up and look after it?
>
> There is no technical reason at all, just a maintenance effort.
>
> The main killer is the whole MMU code, which I'm butchering with NV,
> and that I suspect Will will also turn upside down with his stuff.
> Not to mention the hypercall interface that will need a complete overhaul.
>
> If we wanted to decouple the two, we'd need to make the MMU code, the
> hypercalls, arm.c and a number of other bits private to 32bit.
Right, the prospective kvm-arm maintainer's gameplan would essentially
be an equivalent "move virt/kvm/arm to arch/arm/kvm" patch, but then
ripping out all the Armv8 and GICv3 gubbins instead. Yes, there would
then be lots of *similar* code to start with, but it would only diverge
further as v8 architecture development continues independently.
Anyway, I just thought it seemed worth saying out loud, to reassure
folks that a realistic middle-ground between "yay bye!" and "oh no the
end of the world!" does exist, namely "someone else's problem" :)
Robin.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-20 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200210141344eucas1p25a6da0b0251931ef3659397a6f34c0c3@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2020-02-10 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Removing support for 32bit KVM/arm host Marc Zyngier
2020-02-10 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] arm: Unplug KVM from the build system Marc Zyngier
2020-02-10 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] arm: Remove KVM from config files Marc Zyngier
2020-02-10 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] arm: Remove 32bit KVM host support Marc Zyngier
2020-02-10 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] arm: Remove HYP/Stage-2 page-table support Marc Zyngier
2020-02-10 14:13 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] arm: Remove GICv3 vgic compatibility macros Marc Zyngier
2020-02-10 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] Removing support for 32bit KVM/arm host Olof Johansson
2020-02-10 15:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-10 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2020-02-10 16:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-10 16:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-11 15:12 ` Vladimir Murzin
2020-02-11 15:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-02-17 0:14 ` Linus Walleij
2020-02-19 13:53 ` Stefan Agner
2020-02-20 11:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-19 14:56 ` Christoffer Dall
2020-02-19 15:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-19 15:46 ` Jan Kiszka
2020-02-20 10:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-20 12:44 ` Marek Szyprowski
2020-02-20 13:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-20 13:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-20 13:32 ` Robin Murphy
2020-02-20 14:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-20 14:38 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2020-02-22 14:21 ` Takashi Yoshi
2020-02-22 14:40 ` Takashi Yoshi
2020-02-22 21:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-02-25 21:34 ` Takashi Yoshi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a984189-78bb-2707-3714-13edcee9e8f5@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).