From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF27C004C9 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 11:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AF9206A3 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 11:45:50 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 96AF9206A3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0674D4A369; Tue, 7 May 2019 07:45:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6GvmapVFVsX9; Tue, 7 May 2019 07:45:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64784A479; Tue, 7 May 2019 07:45:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03EB4A379 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 07:45:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GSLP3B+ZN1dH for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 07:45:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from foss.arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FE54A369 for ; Tue, 7 May 2019 07:45:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C8980D; Tue, 7 May 2019 04:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.196.129] (ostrya.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.129]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 409F63F5AF; Tue, 7 May 2019 04:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/23] iommu: Introduce cache_invalidate API To: Jacob Pan References: <20190408121911.24103-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <20190408121911.24103-6-eric.auger@redhat.com> <6af5ddb7-75ad-7d3f-b303-f6f06adb1bf0@arm.com> <20190502094624.43924be8@jacob-builder> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker Message-ID: <5cbc5c09-8a34-5c47-981b-35c682d7f699@arm.com> Date: Tue, 7 May 2019 12:45:23 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190502094624.43924be8@jacob-builder> Content-Language: en-US Cc: "kevin.tian@intel.com" , Vincent Stehle , "ashok.raj@intel.com" , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , "alex.williamson@redhat.com" , Robin Murphy , "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , "eric.auger.pro@gmail.com" X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On 02/05/2019 17:46, Jacob Pan wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2019 11:53:34 +0100 > Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: > >> On 02/05/2019 07:58, Auger Eric wrote: >>> Hi Jean-Philippe, >>> >>> On 5/1/19 12:38 PM, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote: >>>> On 08/04/2019 13:18, Eric Auger wrote: >>>>> +int iommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct >>>>> device *dev, >>>>> + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info >>>>> *inv_info) +{ >>>>> + int ret = 0; >>>>> + >>>>> + if (unlikely(!domain->ops->cache_invalidate)) >>>>> + return -ENODEV; >>>>> + >>>>> + ret = domain->ops->cache_invalidate(domain, dev, >>>>> inv_info); + >>>>> + return ret; >>>> >>>> Nit: you don't really need ret >>>> >>>> The UAPI looks good to me, so >>>> >>>> Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker >>>> >>> Just to make sure, do you accept changes proposed by Jacob in >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/4/29/659 ie. >>> - the addition of NR_IOMMU_INVAL_GRANU in enum >>> iommu_inv_granularity and >>> - the addition of NR_IOMMU_CACHE_TYPE >> >> Ah sorry, I forgot about that, I'll review the next version. Yes they >> can be useful (maybe call them IOMMU_INV_GRANU_NR and >> IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR?). I guess it's legal to export in UAPI values >> that will change over time, as VFIO also does it in its enums. >> > I am fine with the names. Maybe you can put this patch in your sva/api > branch once you reviewed it? Having a common branch for common code > makes life so much easier. Done, with minor whitespace and name fixes Thanks, Jean _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm