kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/10] arm64: Retrieve stolen time as paravirtualized guest
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 21:28:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86a79wzdhk.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191011125930.40834-11-steven.price@arm.com>

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:59:30 +0100,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Enable paravirtualization features when running under a hypervisor
> supporting the PV_TIME_ST hypercall.
> 
> For each (v)CPU, we ask the hypervisor for the location of a shared
> page which the hypervisor will use to report stolen time to us. We set
> pv_time_ops to the stolen time function which simply reads the stolen
> value from the shared page for a VCPU. We guarantee single-copy
> atomicity using READ_ONCE which means we can also read the stolen
> time for another VCPU than the currently running one while it is
> potentially being updated by the hypervisor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |   6 +-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h             |   9 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c                  | 148 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/time.c                      |   3 +
>  include/linux/cpuhotplug.h                    |   1 +
>  5 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index c7ac2f3ac99f..346b1c7a4afb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3083,9 +3083,9 @@
>  			[X86,PV_OPS] Disable paravirtualized VMware scheduler
>  			clock and use the default one.
>  
> -	no-steal-acc	[X86,KVM] Disable paravirtualized steal time accounting.
> -			steal time is computed, but won't influence scheduler
> -			behaviour
> +	no-steal-acc	[X86,KVM,ARM64] Disable paravirtualized steal time
> +			accounting. steal time is computed, but won't
> +			influence scheduler behaviour
>  
>  	nolapic		[X86-32,APIC] Do not enable or use the local APIC.
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
> index 799d9dd6f7cc..125c26c42902 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,13 @@ static inline u64 paravirt_steal_clock(int cpu)
>  {
>  	return pv_ops.time.steal_clock(cpu);
>  }
> -#endif
> +
> +int __init kvm_guest_init(void);
> +
> +#else
> +
> +#define kvm_guest_init()
> +
> +#endif // CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> index 4cfed91fe256..de73dbec238c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
> @@ -6,13 +6,161 @@
>   * Author: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
>   */
>  
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "kvmarm-pv: " fmt
> +
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
>  #include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/jump_label.h>
> +#include <linux/printk.h>
> +#include <linux/psci.h>
> +#include <linux/reboot.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
> +
>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> +#include <asm/pvclock-abi.h>
> +#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
>  
>  struct static_key paravirt_steal_enabled;
>  struct static_key paravirt_steal_rq_enabled;
>  
>  struct paravirt_patch_template pv_ops;
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_ops);
> +
> +struct kvmarm_stolen_time_region {
> +	struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time *kaddr;
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvmarm_stolen_time_region, stolen_time_region);
> +
> +static bool steal_acc = true;
> +static int __init parse_no_stealacc(char *arg)
> +{
> +	steal_acc = false;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +early_param("no-steal-acc", parse_no_stealacc);
> +
> +/* return stolen time in ns by asking the hypervisor */
> +static u64 kvm_steal_clock(int cpu)

This isn't KVM specific.

> +{
> +	struct kvmarm_stolen_time_region *reg;
> +
> +	reg = per_cpu_ptr(&stolen_time_region, cpu);
> +	if (!reg->kaddr) {
> +		pr_warn_once("stolen time enabled but not configured for cpu %d\n",
> +			     cpu);
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return le64_to_cpu(READ_ONCE(reg->kaddr->stolen_time));
> +}
> +
> +static int disable_stolen_time_current_cpu(void)
> +{
> +	struct kvmarm_stolen_time_region *reg;
> +
> +	reg = this_cpu_ptr(&stolen_time_region);
> +	if (!reg->kaddr)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	memunmap(reg->kaddr);
> +	memset(reg, 0, sizeof(*reg));
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int stolen_time_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	return disable_stolen_time_current_cpu();
> +}

You can merge these two functions, as there is no other caller.

> +
> +static int init_stolen_time_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct kvmarm_stolen_time_region *reg;
> +	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> +	reg = this_cpu_ptr(&stolen_time_region);
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_ST, &res);
> +
> +	if ((long)res.a0 < 0)
> +		return -EINVAL;

I'd rather you check an actual error code, just in case the memory map
starts growing to a point where we have 64bit (I)PAs...

> +
> +	reg->kaddr = memremap(res.a0,
> +			      sizeof(struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time),
> +			      MEMREMAP_WB);
> +
> +	if (!reg->kaddr) {
> +		pr_warn("Failed to map stolen time data structure\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (le32_to_cpu(reg->kaddr->revision) != 0 ||
> +	    le32_to_cpu(reg->kaddr->attributes) != 0) {
> +		pr_warn("Unexpected revision or attributes in stolen time data\n");

WARN_ONCE instead? You probably don't want to scream for each and
every CPU that boots...

> +		return -ENXIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_init_stolen_time(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ARM_KVMPV_STARTING,
> +				"hypervisor/kvmarm/pv:starting",
> +				init_stolen_time_cpu, stolen_time_dying_cpu);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool has_kvm_steal_clock(void)

This is not KVM specific either.

> +{
> +	struct arm_smccc_res res;
> +
> +	/* To detect the presence of PV time support we require SMCCC 1.1+ */
> +	if (psci_ops.smccc_version < SMCCC_VERSION_1_1)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
> +			     ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_FEATURES, &res);
> +
> +	if (res.a0 != SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_FEATURES,
> +			     ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_ST, &res);
> +
> +	if (res.a0 != SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return true;

	return (res.a0 == SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS);

> +}
> +
> +int __init kvm_guest_init(void)

How about something like pv_time_init() instead? In the guest, this is
no way KVM specific, and I still hope for this to work on things like
Xen/HyperV/VMware (yeah, I'm foolishly optimistic). All the references
to KVM should go, and be replaced by something more generic (after
all, you're only implementing the spec, so feel free to call it
den0057_* if you really want).

> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!has_kvm_steal_clock())
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	ret = kvm_arm_init_stolen_time();
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	pv_ops.time.steal_clock = kvm_steal_clock;
> +
> +	static_key_slow_inc(&paravirt_steal_enabled);
> +	if (steal_acc)
> +		static_key_slow_inc(&paravirt_steal_rq_enabled);
> +
> +	pr_info("using stolen time PV\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
> index 0b2946414dc9..a52aea14c6ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>  
>  #include <asm/thread_info.h>
>  #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
>  
>  unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> @@ -65,4 +66,6 @@ void __init time_init(void)
>  
>  	/* Calibrate the delay loop directly */
>  	lpj_fine = arch_timer_rate / HZ;
> +
> +	kvm_guest_init();
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> index 068793a619ca..89d75edb5750 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
>  	/* Must be the last timer callback */
>  	CPUHP_AP_DUMMY_TIMER_STARTING,
>  	CPUHP_AP_ARM_XEN_STARTING,
> +	CPUHP_AP_ARM_KVMPV_STARTING,
>  	CPUHP_AP_ARM_CORESIGHT_STARTING,
>  	CPUHP_AP_ARM64_ISNDEP_STARTING,
>  	CPUHP_AP_SMPCFD_DYING,
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> 

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-19 20:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-11 12:59 [PATCH v6 00/10] arm64: Stolen time support Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] KVM: arm64: Document PV-time interface Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Factor out hypercall handling from PSCI code Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] KVM: arm64: Implement PV_TIME_FEATURES call Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] KVM: Implement kvm_put_guest() Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] KVM: arm64: Support stolen time reporting via shared structure Steven Price
2019-10-19 11:12   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 10:21     ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 10:40       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 11:24         ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] KVM: Allow kvm_device_ops to be const Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] KVM: arm64: Provide VCPU attributes for stolen time Steven Price
2019-10-19 11:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 11:00     ` Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] arm/arm64: Provide a wrapper for SMCCC 1.1 calls Steven Price
2019-10-21 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 13:43     ` Steven Price
2019-10-21 14:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] arm/arm64: Make use of the SMCCC 1.1 wrapper Steven Price
2019-10-11 12:59 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] arm64: Retrieve stolen time as paravirtualized guest Steven Price
2019-10-19 20:28   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2019-10-21  5:01     ` Jürgen Groß
2019-10-21  7:55       ` Marc Zyngier
2019-10-21 12:14     ` Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86a79wzdhk.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).