kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, oupton@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	dmatlack@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	qperret@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	andrew.jones@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com,
	alexandru.elisei@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	eric.auger@redhat.com, gshan@redhat.com, reijiw@google.com,
	rananta@google.com, bgardon@google.com, ricarkol@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:01:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jqq5djt.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230307034555.39733-12-ricarkol@google.com>

On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 03:45:54 +0000,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com> wrote:
> 
> This is the arm64 counterpart of commit cb00a70bd4b7 ("KVM: x86/mmu:
> Split huge pages mapped by the TDP MMU during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG"),
> which has the benefit of splitting the cost of splitting a memslot
> across multiple ioctls.
> 
> Split huge pages on the range specified using KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG.
> And do not split when enabling dirty logging if
> KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET is set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 910aea6bbd1e..d54223b5db97 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1089,8 +1089,8 @@ static void kvm_mmu_split_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, int slot)
>   * @mask:	The mask of pages at offset 'gfn_offset' in this memory
>   *		slot to enable dirty logging on
>   *
> - * Writes protect selected pages to enable dirty logging for them. Caller must
> - * acquire kvm->mmu_lock.
> + * Splits selected pages to PAGE_SIZE and then writes protect them to enable
> + * dirty logging for them. Caller must acquire kvm->mmu_lock.

The code does things in the opposite order...

>   */
>  void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> @@ -1103,6 +1103,13 @@ void kvm_arch_mmu_enable_log_dirty_pt_masked(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  
>  	stage2_wp_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, start, end);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If initially-all-set mode is not set, then huge-pages were already
> +	 * split when enabling dirty logging: no need to do it again.
> +	 */
> +	if (kvm_dirty_log_manual_protect_and_init_set(kvm))

This contradicts the comment. Which one is correct?

> +		kvm_mmu_split_huge_pages(kvm, start, end);
>  }
>  
>  static void kvm_send_hwpoison_signal(unsigned long address, short lsb)
> @@ -1889,7 +1896,9 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		 * this when deleting, moving, disabling dirty logging, or
>  		 * creating the memslot (a nop). Doing it for deletes makes
>  		 * sure we don't leak memory, and there's no need to keep the
> -		 * cache around for any of the other cases.
> +		 * cache around for any of the other cases. Keeping the cache
> +		 * is useful for successive KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG calls, which is
> +		 * not handled in this function.

Where is it handled then?

>  		 */
>  		kvm_mmu_free_memory_cache(&kvm->arch.mmu.split_page_cache);
>  	}

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-12 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-07  3:45 [PATCH v6 00/12] Implement Eager Page Splitting for ARM Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] KVM: arm64: Rename free_removed to free_unlinked Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK ctx->flags for skipping BBM and CMO Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 10:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-13 18:49     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating unlinked stage2 subtrees Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 11:06   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-13 22:23     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 11:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-13 23:58     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-15 18:09       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-15 18:51         ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu() Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] KVM: arm64: Export kvm_are_all_memslots_empty() Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 11:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-13 15:18     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-14 10:18       ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-15 21:00         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_CAP_ARM_EAGER_SPLIT_CHUNK_SIZE Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 11:56   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-03-24  7:41     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-29  4:50   ` Reiji Watanabe
2023-04-10 20:04     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 12:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-04-10 18:32     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] KVM: arm64: Open-code kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked() Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 13:01   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-04-10 18:26     ` Ricardo Koller
2023-03-07  3:45 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] KVM: arm64: Use local TLBI on permission relaxation Ricardo Koller
2023-03-12 13:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2023-04-10 18:22     ` Ricardo Koller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874jqq5djt.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=reijiw@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@gmail.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).