From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, oupton@google.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, dmatlack@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, qperret@google.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev,
seanjc@google.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, eric.auger@redhat.com, gshan@redhat.com,
reijiw@google.com, rananta@google.com, ricarkol@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_REMOVED into ctx->flags
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 16:51:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANgfPd9gMoR=F3uKhDtjsUV0efuoNvCLV0o0WoJKm9zx_PaKsQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230113035000.480021-2-ricarkol@google.com>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:50 PM Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com> wrote:
>
> Add a flag to kvm_pgtable_visit_ctx, KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_REMOVED, to
> indicate that the walk is on a removed table not accesible to the HW
> page-table walker. Then use it to avoid doing break-before-make or
> performing CMOs (Cache Maintenance Operations) when mapping a removed
Nit: Should this say unmapping? Or are we actually going to use this
to map memory ?
> table. This is safe as these removed tables are not visible to the HW
> page-table walker. This will be used in a subsequent commit for
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-24 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-13 3:49 [PATCH 0/9] KVM: arm64: Eager Huge-page splitting for dirty-logging Ricardo Koller
2023-01-13 3:49 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: arm64: Add KVM_PGTABLE_WALK_REMOVED into ctx->flags Ricardo Koller
2023-01-24 0:51 ` Ben Gardon [this message]
2023-01-24 0:56 ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-24 16:32 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-24 18:00 ` Ben Gardon
2023-01-26 18:48 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-24 16:30 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-13 3:49 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm64: Add helper for creating removed stage2 subtrees Ricardo Koller
2023-01-14 17:58 ` kernel test robot
2023-01-24 0:55 ` Ben Gardon
2023-01-24 16:35 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-24 17:07 ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-13 3:49 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_pgtable_stage2_split() Ricardo Koller
2023-01-24 1:03 ` Ben Gardon
2023-01-24 16:46 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-24 17:11 ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-24 17:18 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-24 17:48 ` David Matlack
2023-01-24 20:28 ` Oliver Upton
2023-02-06 9:20 ` Zheng Chuan
2023-02-06 16:28 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-13 3:49 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: arm64: Refactor kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() Ricardo Koller
2023-01-13 3:49 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: arm64: Add kvm_uninit_stage2_mmu() Ricardo Koller
2023-01-13 3:49 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages when dirty logging is enabled Ricardo Koller
2023-01-24 17:52 ` Ben Gardon
2023-01-24 22:19 ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-24 22:45 ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-26 18:45 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-26 19:25 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-26 20:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-27 15:45 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-30 21:18 ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 1:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-31 17:45 ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 17:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-31 19:06 ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 18:01 ` David Matlack
2023-01-31 18:19 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-31 18:35 ` Oliver Upton
2023-01-31 10:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-01-31 10:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-02-06 16:35 ` Ricardo Koller
2023-01-13 3:49 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: arm64: Open-code kvm_mmu_write_protect_pt_masked() Ricardo Koller
2023-01-13 3:49 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: arm64: Split huge pages during KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG Ricardo Koller
2023-01-13 3:50 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: arm64: Use local TLBI on permission relaxation Ricardo Koller
2023-01-24 0:48 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM: arm64: Eager Huge-page splitting for dirty-logging Ben Gardon
2023-01-24 16:50 ` Ricardo Koller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANgfPd9gMoR=F3uKhDtjsUV0efuoNvCLV0o0WoJKm9zx_PaKsQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@gmail.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).