From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3A5C433F5 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A050610FE for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:39:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 7A050610FE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C692A4B1E2; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:39:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rsC6t3ZV8Vcb; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:39:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50ED4B1E4; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:39:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8244B1E2 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:39:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hpkPRREhtKOe for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:39:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com (mail-lf1-f51.google.com [209.85.167.51]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DCCA4B093 for ; Tue, 7 Sep 2021 10:39:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id z2so20009946lft.1 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 07:39:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=x6okiQWF8AWFwYz1Cx6jMTOqJOfQYTektKqGR290ROg=; b=V2qEkRgiMmtEYTFLxX6J+B9SOiG5pqyIEk6sT9arTMp/i8bI0688TfDreT7NZMcLKi L9Pnx1OXuIi+1cpOVc7i09msj9YvfeKnBTBjqTRqYFA48qZ4gscqoBQidGUlEMBOO6f8 iMFQkB8sPVF2+bpefC4VYQf31ojrDtyWi4TknWwpJDRd0g1N6A3VLt9YrTXcKTRacyhp 7OtzpSCO6xBruPi96UCYckSWqfMAVNeNVabDnbl+ot9T0ExTMvb7UoKhazKaeKnenGML qJwu4Rylbzt0rFgXd8xURIzCzAsuZNeLpeRn0mMBr+deeD6st1CD5muzrNq04SHUE5Fg yzlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=x6okiQWF8AWFwYz1Cx6jMTOqJOfQYTektKqGR290ROg=; b=Z1ivDNfDW9Ur4dBJEb8mnPkb4gddsoM5kYHppq+qSOEWM1njcLgT8xFkyophNMn7+L yCVw52o+gfOB4uh9iaSqxIuXokI1Lwj/a9nW2Givg8Dg+1Da7SwkWssbJpF4pvGMIfah /beIVTQS5c/L9azmLXHDmTLYn207bFbW05Q+7WvSsIjHmga/iadr1NqjlcVTAueVon7G reu/HUBVxvrZZ5GugaCshevbViKwe4QxSqmQD/C7Q1meX94c0aGFHQ0JKsnqBViGU62g yu7WbA8JByZjWqWYjer3hvq68y3TRwfJ8YoOByEXinduWu6WoHpF1W6tHvrRBuC7kH1l iYZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530y4KrmD54plWQNn8rAhpQ/OBZ4DHIzt5i8hcbp4bQNOn6UQCGb iTqqNKjXUroi8NPSuITQM/XQkq53m7bvdeGyJad39ASL+9J1Yw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVua1emB5yUEIXuBSevHAq/VVvrfNQXiKWKkwtCPQFHxdZHjnKt3AtlFnJ/ycmAv2naidJ2mOsUgS8wJ8aCaI= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:51a2:: with SMTP id f2mr13195347lfk.685.1631025563601; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 07:39:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210903231154.25091-1-ricarkol@google.com> <20210903231154.25091-3-ricarkol@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20210903231154.25091-3-ricarkol@google.com> From: Oliver Upton Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 09:39:12 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: build the memslot tests for arm64 To: Ricardo Koller Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, pshier@google.com, Paolo Bonzini , maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Ricardo, On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 6:12 PM Ricardo Koller wrote: > > Add memslot_perf_test and memslot_modification_stress_test to the list > of aarch64 selftests. > > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller There isn't anything that prevents these tests from being used for s390x too right? Of course, we haven't anything to test on but just a thought. Besides Drew's comments: Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm