From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2765DC19F2D for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 21:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982A74CEEA; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:38:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@google.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id po1h3fZnO674; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:38:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2DE4CF16; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:38:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE4D4CEEA for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:38:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iTR5mLvhl9Em for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:38:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com (mail-pj1-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603B44CF12 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2022 17:38:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id p14-20020a17090a74ce00b001f4d04492faso205641pjl.4 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:38:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=o8zzCiEtSfxFlAxZzKI7HqSYHHhfKIfxoT6ysA2mwRQ=; b=mz0Fjqu9dzg7nU0PCSUBlYeJVZ9gb/NvoAjp4klMVPqMWGBhoN7T4Z0A+Z5dI9GQUf nxY8R3gRW2W8Mae+vrr6Ov/btiZ6+vE6BrY4Kb0G+XnUcpHcplU/LqFC9QnvoIdHE0Bu /g+230V6KN4RaDF9l6q2AfbJ23OtFDrDFA/ZMoH1TKvz1vpKNLrWVhnVtBHLzuUnvgWh pTqM3Ksr4fhJ+B6dQYaaJwgY5DL1KZxkL90D8RAM62drfSjOX14jlDF7PTkcKwENBXt2 MtUmXKj5VBSQVKk2fMfgtzxlsBv5KLSPjbe0t1StTlu3+6htVnbMD0KVSeQgELY8ybIb afPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=o8zzCiEtSfxFlAxZzKI7HqSYHHhfKIfxoT6ysA2mwRQ=; b=WKs6Zqw7bd3kItJuxBlnWsEEGjKT5mtngENwf10SPy9F0bPhagnyHIJOQ0FidMzK8G tpZSPLmh/KEkjNblDc7xtT09WVZ67vExsrFrlntf7AlZLyKl3DU1yJf1UmsgVZREx5jg WsgnN1m8G5dy2jg1mpiKyU1+bz/b3vD//GytWI+zOIF1bFMpeUyE3MPlZY5ca/vd1fvv O2zgIqHpRYW92B3jGZMIgreryv9hj1jXSOcDYsovlMHTXdbsBWmCWM0F4tI7jYu0AZFE Yuxzwhy1n1fVwwGMgZaC+Qx44d5Y+JEixoNCRS421BGar/UldJQxBTrvqG+okgO6Rhcz c89Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo0wz317Y6r9rwDkS/zP3EeAvomeTojTtUFY3Gd49bcJAMhT7Nob XcUnlPx3P5SMQ+MEllymeyJl8Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR4J/HhURqfPvPpi43Q7Bija6xPtnqX55byjC51oilG8jZwpXiNOXRPE6CWpwE3OWAgXLExSyw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8b87:b0:16f:1bb7:984a with SMTP id ay7-20020a1709028b8700b0016f1bb7984amr24756042plb.113.1660081114308; Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (7.104.168.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.168.104.7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u8-20020a1709026e0800b0016f1204cde8sm11219119plk.301.2022.08.09.14.38.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Aug 2022 14:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 21:38:29 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Mathieu Desnoyers Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Make rseq compatible with glibc-2.35 Message-ID: References: <20220809060627.115847-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20220809060627.115847-2-gshan@redhat.com> <8735e6ncxw.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <7844e3fa-e49e-de75-e424-e82d3a023dd6@redhat.com> <87o7wtnay6.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <616d4de6-81f6-9d14-4e57-4a79fec45690@redhat.com> <797306043.114963.1660047714774.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> <1014177394.115022.1660052656961.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1014177394.115022.1660052656961.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> Cc: Florian Weimer , shan gavin , KVM list , maz , linux-kernel , andrew jones , yihyu@redhat.com, linux-kselftest , Paolo Bonzini , shuah , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On Tue, Aug 09, 2022, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > ----- On Aug 9, 2022, at 8:21 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com wrote: > > > ----- Gavin Shan wrote: > >> Hi Florian, > >> > >> On 8/9/22 5:16 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> >>> __builtin_thread_pointer doesn't work on all architectures/GCC > >> >>> versions. > >> >>> Is this a problem for selftests? > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> It's a problem as the test case is running on all architectures. I think I > >> >> need introduce our own __builtin_thread_pointer() for where it's not > >> >> supported: (1) PowerPC (2) x86 without GCC 11 > >> >> > >> >> Please let me know if I still have missed cases where > >> >> __buitin_thread_pointer() isn't supported? > >> > > >> > As far as I know, these are the two outliers that also have rseq > >> > support. The list is a bit longer if we also consider non-rseq > >> > architectures (csky, hppa, ia64, m68k, microblaze, sparc, don't know > >> > about the Linux architectures without glibc support). > >> > > >> > >> For kvm/selftests, there are 3 architectures involved actually. So we > >> just need consider 4 cases: aarch64, x86, s390 and other. For other > >> case, we just use __builtin_thread_pointer() to maintain code's > >> integrity, but it's not called at all. > >> > >> I think kvm/selftest is always relying on glibc if I'm correct. > > > > All those are handled in the rseq selftests and in librseq. Why duplicate all > > that logic again? > > More to the point, considering that we have all the relevant rseq registration > code in tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq.c already, and the relevant thread > pointer getter code in tools/testing/selftests/rseq/rseq-*thread-pointer.h, > is there an easy way to get test applications in tools/testing/selftests/kvm > and in tools/testing/selftests/rseq to share that common code ? > > Keeping duplicated compatibility code is bad for long-term maintainability. Any reason not to simply add tools/lib/rseq.c and then expose a helper to get the registered rseq struct? _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm