kvmarm.lists.cs.columbia.edu archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Zhang Lei <zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: arm64: Discard any SVE state when entering KVM guests
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 21:21:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyogzYzVbb3mvZWM@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zgeuj8ry.wl-maz@kernel.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 622 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 05:44:01PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> >  void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  {
> >  	BUG_ON(!current->mm);
> > -	BUG_ON(test_thread_flag(TIF_SVE));
> > +
> > +	fpsimd_kvm_prepare();
> 
> Why is this *before* the check against system_supports_fpsimd()? I
> don't think the architecture allows SVE without FP, for obvious
> reasons...

Good point, though now that I think about it I can't think of a
requirement for FP when implementing SME (there's certainly not
one for SVE).  There's no use for that hook now though.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 151 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-20 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-15 22:55 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64/sve: Clean up KVM integration and optimise syscalls Mark Brown
2022-08-15 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] KVM: arm64: Discard any SVE state when entering KVM guests Mark Brown
2022-09-20 16:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 20:21     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-09-21 17:31       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-22 11:44         ` Mark Brown
2022-08-15 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64/fpsimd: Track the saved FPSIMD state type separately to TIF_SVE Mark Brown
2022-09-20 17:14   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 18:09     ` Mark Brown
2022-09-20 18:30       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-15 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64/fpsimd: Have KVM explicitly say which FP registers to save Mark Brown
2022-09-20 17:52   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 18:32     ` Mark Brown
2022-09-21 17:47       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-22 12:18         ` Mark Brown
2022-08-15 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64/fpsimd: Stop using TIF_SVE to manage register saving in KVM Mark Brown
2022-09-20 18:04   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 18:53     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-15 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64/fpsimd: Load FP state based on recorded data type Mark Brown
2022-09-20 18:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 19:02     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-15 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64/fpsimd: SME no longer requires SVE register state Mark Brown
2022-08-15 22:55 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64/sve: Leave SVE enabled on syscall if we don't context switch Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YyogzYzVbb3mvZWM@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=zhang.lei@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).