Re: [Question] About scaling factor of Enhanced Counter Virtualization

[zhukeqian <zhukeqian1@huawei.com>]

On 2020/7/14 20:23, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-07-14 13:15, zhukeqian wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 2020/7/14 19:34, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> Hi Keqian,
>>>
>>> On 2020-07-14 03:20, zhukeqian wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> We are studying Enhanced Counter Virtualization (introduced by ARMv8.6
>>>> extension), and here is a question
>>>> raised by Biaoxiang Ye <yebiaoxiang@huawei.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Described in the ARMv8.6 Extension Specification:
>>>> Note: the scaling factor CNTSCALE is designed as a 2.62 bit fixed
>>>> point number, so permitting a scaling up by
>>>> (nearly) a factor 4. The scaling factor CNTISCALE is signed as an 8.56
>>>> number for the scaling of the values
>>>> written into the timers for comparison with the actual count. This
>>>> implies that the greatest scaling down of the
>>>> counter supported in (nearly) a factor of *512*.
>>>>
>>>> We think the number "512" should be "256" (2^8), or do we miss something?
>>>
>>> This register doesn't seem to be described in ARM DDI 0487F.b,
>>> which is the official documentation and does contain the ARMv8.6
>>> material, including ARMv8.6-ECV.
>>>
>>> Either you are looking at confidential information (and nobody
>>> can answer you in public), or obsolete information (and nobody
>>> knows what this is about).
>>>
>> Well, it's alpha release version :( . Many thanks!
> 
> Wow. I suggest you discard this document, as it is obsolete.
> ARMv8.6 is a released version of the architecture, and
> everything should be in the ARM ARM.
OK, there are many difference :) .

Thanks,
Keqian
> 
>         M.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm