From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kvm: Annotate assembly using modern annoations
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:19:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8e8da7f1e02e9c2f8e67968697bdf85@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214114027.GA4827@sirena.org.uk>
On 2020-02-14 11:40, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 09:36:56PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 2020-02-13 15:38, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>> > -ENTRY(__kvm_call_hyp)
>> > +SYM_FUNC_START(__kvm_call_hyp)
>
>> I'm not convinced by this particular change. _kvm_call_hyp is called
>> directly from
>> C, and behaves almost like a normal function. What's the issue here?
>
> I'm not sure I understand your comment here - this is annotated as
> SYM_FUNC_ which is the annotation for things that look like normal
> C functions.
You're right, apologies. I got confused between _FUNC_ and _CODE_.
>
>> > .align 11
>> > -ENTRY(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs_start)
>> > +SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs)
>> > +SYM_INNER_LABEL(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs_start, SYM_L_GLOBAL)
>
>> Why isn't SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN enough? And what is the rational for
>
> The _start and _end labels that were there before are explicitly
> referenced by code, removing them would break the build.
But if we're going to clean things up, I'd rather we actually do that.
The only time __bp_harden_hyp_vecs_end is used is when computing the
size of the vectors, and that'd better be BP_HARDEN_EL2_SLOTS * 2kB
(which can be statically asserted at compile time).
>
>> the _NOALIGN, btw? I'd expect an alignment of 2kB to be more than
>> enough.
>
> So that the explicit .align above takes effect rather than anything the
> macro decides to do, I'm trying to err on the side of caution here.
I don't think we need this. The macros should do the right thing, and
be fixed if they don't.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-13 15:38 [PATCH] arm64: kvm: Annotate assembly using modern annoations Mark Brown
2020-02-13 21:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-02-14 11:40 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-14 14:19 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-02-14 14:52 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-14 15:04 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e8e8da7f1e02e9c2f8e67968697bdf85@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).