From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D74BC2D0EF for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F0322240 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:11:33 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D9F0322240 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548954B1F1; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:11:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jrfjFZudxnNV; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:11:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225C14B20D; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:11:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0104B201 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:11:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q5R2ww1Wh7nM for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:11:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D023E4B1F1 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:11:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3C230E; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:11:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.110] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 935F53F73D; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested Virtualization support To: "Zengtao (B)" , Marc Zyngier References: <06d08f904f003160a48eac3c5ab3c7ff@kernel.org> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED342E29B9@dggemm526-mbx.china.huawei.com> <86r1wus7df.wl-maz@kernel.org> <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED3A535FCF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> From: Alexandru Elisei Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 16:11:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED3A535FCF@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> Content-Language: en-US Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" , Ganapatrao Kulkarni , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "andre.przywara@arm.com" , "Dave.Martin@arm.com" , George Cherian , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Anil Kumar Reddy H X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Hi, On 4/16/20 2:38 AM, Zengtao (B) wrote: > Hi Marc: > > Got it. > Really a bit patch set :) > > BTW, I have done a basic kvm unit test > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm-unit-tests.git > And I find that after apply the patch KVM: arm64: VNCR-ize ELR_EL1, > The psci test failed for some reason, I can't understand why, this > is only the test result.(find the patch by git bisect + kvm test) Just a heads-up, a couple of fixes to kvm-unit-tests were merged last week, and among them was one touching the psci code, e14e6ba56f6e ("arm/arm64: psci: Don't run C code without stack or vectors"). It might be worth checking that you have it, and if you don't, if applying it fixes the issue. Thanks, Alex > > My platform: Hisilicon D06 board. > Linux kernel: Linux 5.6-rc6 + nv patches(some rebases) > Could you help to take a look? > > Thanks > Zengtao > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marc Zyngier [mailto:maz@kernel.org] >> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2020 5:24 PM >> To: Zengtao (B) >> Cc: George Cherian; Dave.Martin@arm.com; alexandru.elisei@arm.com; >> andre.przywara@arm.com; christoffer.dall@arm.com; >> james.morse@arm.com; jintack@cs.columbia.edu; >> julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com; kvm@vger.kernel.org; >> kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; >> suzuki.poulose@arm.com; Anil Kumar Reddy H; Ganapatrao Kulkarni >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/94] KVM: arm64: ARMv8.3/8.4 Nested >> Virtualization support >> >> Hi Zengtao, >> >> On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 05:10:05 +0100, >> "Zengtao (B)" wrote: >>> Hi Marc: >>> >>> Since it's a very large patch series, I want to test it on my platform >>> which don't support nv, and want to make sure if this patch series >>> affects the existed virtualization functions or not. >>> >>> Any suggestion about the test focus? >> Not really. Given that the NV patches affect absolutely every >> architectural parts of KVM/arm64, everything needs careful >> testing. But more than testing, it needs reviewing. >> >> Thanks, >> >> M. >> >> -- >> Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm