linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	peterz@infradead.org, vishal.l.verma@intel.com,
	ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/10] acpi/numa/hmat: Skip publishing target info for nodes with no online memory
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 11:19:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <156140037770.2951909.3387200938880485927.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <156140036490.2951909.1837804994781523185.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

There are multiple scenarios where the HMAT may contain information
about proximity domains that are not currently online. Rather than fail
to report any HMAT data just elide those offline domains.

If and when those domains are later onlined they can be added to the
HMEM reporting at that point.

This was found while testing EFI_MEMORY_SP support which reserves
"specific purpose" memory from the general allocation pool. If that
reservation results in an empty numa-node then the node is not marked
online leading a spurious:

    "acpi/hmat: Ignoring HMAT: Invalid table"

...result for HMAT parsing.

Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c |   14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
index 96b7d39a97c6..2c220cb7b620 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c
@@ -96,9 +96,6 @@ static __init void alloc_memory_target(unsigned int mem_pxm)
 {
 	struct memory_target *target;
 
-	if (pxm_to_node(mem_pxm) == NUMA_NO_NODE)
-		return;
-
 	target = find_mem_target(mem_pxm);
 	if (target)
 		return;
@@ -588,6 +585,17 @@ static __init void hmat_register_targets(void)
 	struct memory_target *target;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(target, &targets, node) {
+		int nid = pxm_to_node(target->memory_pxm);
+
+		/*
+		 * Skip offline nodes. This can happen when memory
+		 * marked EFI_MEMORY_SP, "specific purpose", is applied
+		 * to all the memory in a promixity domain leading to
+		 * the node being marked offline / unplugged, or if
+		 * memory-only "hotplug" node is offline.
+		 */
+		if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(nid))
+			continue;
 		hmat_register_target_initiators(target);
 		hmat_register_target_perf(target);
 	}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-24 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-24 18:19 [PATCH v4 00/10] EFI Specific Purpose Memory Support Dan Williams
2019-06-24 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] acpi/numa: Establish a new drivers/acpi/numa/ directory Dan Williams
2019-06-25 14:59   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-25 16:02     ` Dan Williams
2019-07-03 11:09   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-24 18:19 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2019-07-03 11:10   ` [PATCH v4 02/10] acpi/numa/hmat: Skip publishing target info for nodes with no online memory Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-24 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] efi: Enumerate EFI_MEMORY_SP Dan Williams
2019-06-24 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] x86, efi: Push EFI_MEMMAP check into leaf routines Dan Williams
2019-06-24 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] x86, efi: Reserve UEFI 2.8 Specific Purpose Memory for dax Dan Williams
2019-06-25 15:26   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-24 18:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] x86, efi: Add efi_fake_mem support for EFI_MEMORY_SP Dan Williams
2019-06-24 18:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] resource: Uplevel the pmem "region" ida to a global allocator Dan Williams
2019-06-24 18:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] device-dax: Add a driver for "hmem" devices Dan Williams
2019-06-25 15:37   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-06-25 20:07     ` Dan Williams
2019-06-24 18:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] acpi/numa/hmat: Register HMAT at device_initcall level Dan Williams
2019-07-03 11:12   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-24 18:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] acpi/numa/hmat: Register "specific purpose" memory as an "hmem" device Dan Williams
2019-06-25 15:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-07-03 11:17   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=156140037770.2951909.3387200938880485927.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).