From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46269C10F14 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D7620862 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 12:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729741AbfJCMc1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:32:27 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:50422 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729398AbfJCMc1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2019 08:32:27 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2019 05:32:26 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,252,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="343651726" Received: from paasikivi.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.42]) by orsmga004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2019 05:32:23 -0700 Received: from punajuuri.localdomain (punajuuri.localdomain [192.168.240.130]) by paasikivi.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D29C20FFB; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:32:17 +0300 (EEST) Received: from sailus by punajuuri.localdomain with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iG0HL-0002wW-ST; Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:32:19 +0300 From: Sakari Ailus To: Petr Mladek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org Cc: Andy Shevchenko , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Heikki Krogerus , Joe Perches Subject: [PATCH v9 08/12] lib/vsprintf: Add a note on re-using %pf or %pF Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 15:32:15 +0300 Message-Id: <20191003123219.11237-9-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20191003123219.11237-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> References: <20191003123219.11237-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Add a note warning of re-use of obsolete %pf or %pF extensions. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Cc: Steven Rostedt Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- lib/vsprintf.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c index a58329c8fa750..cf48769fe330c 100644 --- a/lib/vsprintf.c +++ b/lib/vsprintf.c @@ -2008,6 +2008,8 @@ static char *kobject_string(char *buf, char *end, void *ptr, * - 'S' For symbolic direct pointers (or function descriptors) with offset * - 's' For symbolic direct pointers (or function descriptors) without offset * - '[Ss]R' as above with __builtin_extract_return_addr() translation + * - '[Ff]' %pf and %pF were obsoleted and later removed in favor of + * %ps and %pS. Be careful when re-using these specifiers. * - 'B' For backtraced symbolic direct pointers with offset * - 'R' For decoded struct resource, e.g., [mem 0x0-0x1f 64bit pref] * - 'r' For raw struct resource, e.g., [mem 0x0-0x1f flags 0x201] -- 2.20.1