From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53CEC4CECE for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F3B20820 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389672AbfJQHQc (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 03:16:32 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:58545 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726208AbfJQHQb (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 03:16:31 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Oct 2019 00:16:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,306,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="208177221" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2019 00:16:29 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.92.2) (envelope-from ) id 1iL01M-0008Pi-8X; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:16:28 +0300 Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:16:28 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Heikki Krogerus , Mika Westerberg , Linus Walleij , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/14] software node: rename is_array to is_inline Message-ID: <20191017071628.GD32742@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20191011230721.206646-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> <20191011230721.206646-11-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> <20191014073720.GH32742@smile.fi.intel.com> <20191015182206.GF105649@dtor-ws> <20191016075940.GP32742@smile.fi.intel.com> <20191016165430.GD35946@dtor-ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191016165430.GD35946@dtor-ws> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 09:54:30AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:59:40AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:22:06AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 10:37:20AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 04:07:17PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > 'stored inline' -> 'embedded in the &struct...' ? > > > > > > I was trying to have a link "stored inline" -> "is_inline". > > > > > > Do we want to change the flag to be "is_embedded"? > > > > In dictionaries I have > > > > embedded <-> unilateral > > Are you trying to show synonym or antonym here? But I am pretty sure > "unilateral" is either. Antonyms. The 'unilateral' is marked as so in the dictionary. > Antonyms for our use of "embedded" are likely "detached" or > "disconnected". > > > inline <-> ??? > > "out of line" but I still believe "stored separately" explains precisely > what we have here. No, 'out of line' is idiom with a special meaning. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko