From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4DBC43331 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324B220679 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726936AbfKLRHw (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:07:52 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:6214 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726896AbfKLRHw (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 12:07:52 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5A1FB471603A22B30AD3; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 01:07:50 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.226.61) by DGGEMS402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 01:07:43 +0800 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:07:34 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: , , , , , Keith Busch , , , Andrew Morton , "Dan Williams" , , , , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/4] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator only domains Message-ID: <20191112170734.0000621a@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1768519.laKBN70clK@kreacher> References: <20191004114330.104746-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <1895971.7mY3IlW731@kreacher> <20191018134656.00000f70@huawei.com> <1768519.laKBN70clK@kreacher> Organization: Huawei X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.226.61] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 15:54:28 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > On Friday, October 18, 2019 2:46:56 PM CET Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Oct 2019 12:18:33 +0200 > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > > > > On Friday, October 4, 2019 1:43:27 PM CEST Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > > Generic Initiators are a new ACPI concept that allows for the > > > > description of proximity domains that contain a device which > > > > performs memory access (such as a network card) but neither > > > > host CPU nor Memory. > > > > > > > > This patch has the parsing code and provides the infrastructure > > > > for an architecture to associate these new domains with their > > > > nearest memory processing node. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron > > > > > > This depends on the series from Dan at: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAPcyv4gBSX58CWH4HZ28w0_cZRzJrhgdEFHa2g8KDqyv8aFqZQ@mail.gmail.com/T/#m1acce3ae8f29f680c0d95fd1e840e703949fbc48 > > > > > Hi Rafael, > > > > Yes. Cover letter mentions it was rebased on v4 of that series. > > > > > AFAICS, so please respin when that one hits the Linus' tree. > > > > Sure, though that pushes it out another cycle and it's beginning to > > get a bit silly (just rebases since April). > > > > I guess it can't be helped given the series hits several trees. > > I've just applied the Dan's series and I can take patch [1/4] from this one, > but for the [2-3/4] I'd like to get some ACKs from the arm64 and x86 people > respectively. Thanks Rafael! Absolutely understood on the need for Acks. For ARM let us try a few more CCs +CC Will, Lorenzo, Hanjun. Also Ingo on basis of showing a passing interest in the x86 patch previously. Otherwise I think we have the x86 people most like to comment already cc'd. https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11174247/ has the full series. I'd appreciate anyone who has time taking a look at these. The actual actions in the architectures are very simple, but I may well be missing some subtlety. > > Thanks! > Thanks, Jonathan