From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
Cc: andrew.murray@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>, Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
james.quinlan@broadcom.com, mbrugger@suse.com,
phil@raspberrypi.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] linux/log2.h: Use roundup/dow_pow_two() on 64bit calculations
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:38:45 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191205203845.GA243596@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191203114743.1294-9-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
The subject contains a couple typos: it's missing "of" and it's
missing the "n" on "down".
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:47:41PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> The function now is safe to use while expecting a 64bit value. Use it
> where relevant.
Please include the function names ("roundup_pow_of_two()",
"rounddown_pow_of_two()") in the changelog so it is self-contained and
doesn't depend on the subject.
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
With the nits above and below addressed,
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> # drivers/pci
> ---
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_clock.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/of/device.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c | 5 +++--
> kernel/dma/direct.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-ep.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>
> #include "pcie-cadence.h"
>
> @@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ static int cdns_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn,
> * roundup_pow_of_two() returns an unsigned long, which is not suited
> * for 64bit values.
> */
Please remove the comment above since it no longer applies.
> - sz = 1ULL << fls64(sz - 1);
> + sz = roundup_pow_of_two(sz);
> aperture = ilog2(sz) - 7; /* 128B -> 0, 256B -> 1, 512B -> 2, ... */
>
> if ((flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE) == PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO) {
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c
> index cd795f6fc1e2..b1689f725b41 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> // Author: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@free-electrons.com>
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>
> #include "pcie-cadence.h"
>
> @@ -15,7 +16,7 @@ void cdns_pcie_set_outbound_region(struct cdns_pcie *pcie, u8 fn,
> * roundup_pow_of_two() returns an unsigned long, which is not suited
> * for 64bit values.
> */
Same here.
> - u64 sz = 1ULL << fls64(size - 1);
> + u64 sz = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
> int nbits = ilog2(sz);
> u32 addr0, addr1, desc0, desc1;
>
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip-ep.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/pci-epf.h>
> #include <linux/sizes.h>
> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>
> #include "pcie-rockchip.h"
>
> @@ -70,7 +71,7 @@ static void rockchip_pcie_prog_ep_ob_atu(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip, u8 fn,
> u32 r, u32 type, u64 cpu_addr,
> u64 pci_addr, size_t size)
> {
> - u64 sz = 1ULL << fls64(size - 1);
> + u64 sz = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
> int num_pass_bits = ilog2(sz);
> u32 addr0, addr1, desc0, desc1;
> bool is_nor_msg = (type == AXI_WRAPPER_NOR_MSG);
> @@ -176,7 +177,7 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, u8 fn,
> * roundup_pow_of_two() returns an unsigned long, which is not suited
> * for 64bit values.
> */
And here.
> - sz = 1ULL << fls64(sz - 1);
> + sz = roundup_pow_of_two(sz);
> aperture = ilog2(sz) - 7; /* 128B -> 0, 256B -> 1, 512B -> 2, ... */
>
> if ((flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE) == PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_SPACE_IO) {
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> index 6af7ae83c4ad..056886c4efec 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ u64 dma_direct_get_required_mask(struct device *dev)
> {
> u64 max_dma = phys_to_dma_direct(dev, (max_pfn - 1) << PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> - return (1ULL << (fls64(max_dma) - 1)) * 2 - 1;
> + return rounddown_pow_of_two(max_dma) * 2 - 1;
Personally I would probably make this one a separate patch since it's
qualitatively different than the others and it would avoid the slight
awkwardness of the non-greppable "roundup/down_pow_of_two()"
construction in the commit subject.
But it's fine either way.
> }
>
> static gfp_t __dma_direct_optimal_gfp_mask(struct device *dev, u64 dma_mask,
> --
> 2.24.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-05 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-03 11:47 [PATCH v4 0/8] Raspberry Pi 4 PCIe support Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 11:47 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] linux/log2.h: Use roundup/dow_pow_two() on 64bit calculations Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-03 15:53 ` Rob Herring
2019-12-03 16:06 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-12-05 20:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2019-12-12 13:21 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191205203845.GA243596@google.com \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mbrugger@suse.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
--cc=phil@raspberrypi.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
--cc=wahrenst@gmx.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).