linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] usb: core: Add ACPI support for USB interfaces
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:00:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200324090037.GB1922688@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324062635.GB1977781@kroah.com>

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 07:26:35AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:55:43PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > The ACPI companion of the device has to be set for USB interfaces
> > in order to read and attach the properties described in the ACPI table.
> > Use ACPI_COMPANION_SET macro to set this.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/core/message.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/message.c b/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> > index 5adf489428aa..d5f834f16993 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/message.c
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> >   * Released under the GPLv2 only.
> >   */
> >  
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> >  #include <linux/pci.h>	/* for scatterlist macros */
> >  #include <linux/usb.h>
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> > @@ -1941,6 +1942,7 @@ int usb_set_configuration(struct usb_device *dev, int configuration)
> >  			intf->dev.of_node = usb_of_get_interface_node(dev,
> >  					configuration, ifnum);
> >  		}
> > +		ACPI_COMPANION_SET(&intf->dev, ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev));
> >  		intf->dev.driver = NULL;
> >  		intf->dev.bus = &usb_bus_type;
> >  		intf->dev.type = &usb_if_device_type;
> 

> And what does this "fix"?

It links the firmware node of physical USB device to USB interface.
Otherwise it will be no firmware nodes under a corresponding folder.

It mimics what is done for OF in couple of lines above.

> Is this a new feature, what isn't working today without this change?

Yes, it is a new feature. I can't tell it fixes anything, because no complains
so far. I doubt it previously works.

> And if it is a fix, should it be backported to older kernels, how far?

No, no need for that. Usually I put Fixes tag when I would like change to be
considered for backporting.

I'll probably update the commit message to clarify all this. Would it be enough?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-24  9:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-23 19:55 [PATCH v1] usb: core: Add ACPI support for USB interfaces Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24  6:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-24  9:00   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-03-24  9:13     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200324090037.GB1922688@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).