From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D66C433E0 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 13:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0BE205CB for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 13:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="PHWMs9Yk" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726691AbgETNec (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 09:34:32 -0400 Received: from www.zeus03.de ([194.117.254.33]:59226 "EHLO mail.zeus03.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726439AbgETNec (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 May 2020 09:34:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=sang-engineering.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=udmxY3eElyisrOqhNbRKohBCfXPS 2K3Axj2gciVQ+Ew=; b=PHWMs9Yk2Na88RyxULIH1iLcLVgRlqO5As6BQZEgRz+M q8Ag46CeHXO9j2718wl7ABf5CpSCjk5Rjybl+afalhMMPTAwB67xYmO65s1lrpDj MbM0QG/kw77XPDjz2gDI9gUDuWcxL2TMMV/JeMgAZ+cUn5GvNU3567wB7bCzdsE= Received: (qmail 673327 invoked from network); 20 May 2020 15:34:30 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 20 May 2020 15:34:30 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@7JqndBSmOt4gAwDPXwjBAFv42Jy9rssU Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 15:34:29 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Hans de Goede , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Lee Jones , Jean Delvare , Jarkko Nikula , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Alexandre Belloni , Max Staudt , Stefan Roese , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mfd: ensure that AXP20X_I2C will have the right deps on X86 Message-ID: <20200520133429.GC5759@ninjato> References: <20200518145302.56642b22@coco.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200518145302.56642b22@coco.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > With that said I'm fine with giving this another try, maybe let > > the test builders / rand config builds play with it for a while > > and see what happens? >=20 > Yeah, it makes sense to me. I'd like to see an ACK from the designware maintainers before sending this upstream. Testing is all fine, of course. --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAl7FMeQACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbHeg/+KhGr/M5GB/4C/j1LiglUMLhY5MY/aTO0UFUQYG2dHkBRmpN1iFHkUa3v QzWcU9uZ1q/Ew84IXLiX+myrbCwX7ugbrQZhR1XnVXmB2SonkJvXeOqdNoLkDFT7 rSU6I3Uu7QnCXQDH986GgH1DGYQehdHArPje833DzUaY1okLE3R8pXYRZvs9eVVq Hf2eKFTNczDYGhXqfTrTW6n9cnvmooIfAMTCj6p9fpbcous61ZUuMgHiPUBMkuoL v7G7+oYpD+R7l2oNIOE/ZTdCp6aJENmEi/seoeNoDAqMDVwYg7XZJUzc3FvJ4pJd Se1H3cIc08Ytqr3Aa1l7kxSZ1iBvf1hf/xIyGO4dTiNJAUxR3QV4oTe2QClqhP38 DLiNZ74/98Aq13XwdOssk9OQXlTMfS4Bd7v4JJcXqJiLtLINbrM6tmfFWkYmGTFJ Rku2P+pvO4bNf/1Szh5rWWPCHRzBc5Ux8hbevO11aHUvf2453U5OsmmVomJK6rn4 fd32JKN8PGOdkZOnPYtHeLdzQcBXouXNk0fxVajFD5hNneuey6dtgU4g4wxh0F33 8ONTBKMFbMhY8AVevHWcMGgwWhdqs+aIZoNldjbFLtrSB1dHe1Fkwuy5OqjvAp9a Lr5Qu7G37ES7GGCb5uiy+XPV4cv7kGpdzhTtz09J18vWi1ogTLw= =LZ2J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xo44VMWPx7vlQ2+2--