From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2910EC433E4 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 21:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C1C2070B for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 21:06:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="BgZK/ls+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726411AbgGXVGr (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:06:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53086 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726083AbgGXVGr (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:06:47 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E27CC0619D3; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 14:06:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CBow5sMSdFqU9XIHLh46kSKhelS/QdYryJzYOsFaK0I=; b=BgZK/ls+cTh3UFlYSRPp5yQZj ppPD3a1eWBLFP7cfSIm8J50embsGjoP6YCXX+hT5mN3vmh8By4mjsttKMDa9jTrvXC78Y9KnooZjB T87daYBgF4QRd2BMmD7QnMbbeMcft+O3i4Ax6kwJ4Mh4URR5AM4F0QBPvZo6xddj49TcLWZplcSv0 HDLHycbtEBNZxjoRyibMaT7HnTWFXI2ZfkzhEmhd+gkpeTmyVP28yJxrrpOkFTw5vgwNZ+YAs1ryd dx3RKLKFTO7WUezFNDPuOLFONz+VzM22dzirRWCh25i3mUWCGdWJW+JbYPmj4nGXry5yEh9xSW5Dl LvXOyoFkg==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:43708) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jz4tv-0000PJ-1R; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 22:06:43 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jz4tt-0000uQ-Ub; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 22:06:41 +0100 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 22:06:41 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Jeremy Linton , Calvin Johnson , Jon , Cristi Sovaiala , Ioana Ciornei , Madalin Bucur , netdev , linux.cj@gmail.com, ACPI Devel Maling List Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 1/6] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: Document MDIO PHY Message-ID: <20200724210641.GD1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20200715090400.4733-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> <20200715090400.4733-2-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> <1a031e62-1e87-fdc1-b672-e3ccf3530fda@arm.com> <20200724133931.GF1472201@lunn.ch> <97973095-5458-8ac2-890c-667f4ea6cd0e@arm.com> <20200724192008.GI1594328@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 11:12:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 10:20 PM Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > I think we need to NACK all attempts to add ACPI support to phylib and > > phylink until an authoritative ACPI Linux maintainer makes an > > appearance and actively steers the work. And not just this patchset, > > but all patchsets in the networking domain which have an ACPI > > component. > > It's funny, since I see ACPI mailing list and none of the maintainers > in the Cc here... > I'm not sure they pay attention to some (noise-like?) activity which > (from their perspective) happens on unrelated lists. That is really disappointing that these patch sets are not being copied to the appropriate people (ACPI). I seem to remember I've already stated on at least a couple of occasions that these patch sets which add ACPI support to phylib need to be copied to ACPI people. I guess if ACPI people have been omitted, there will be a few more patch series iterations. Then there's that all the discussion that has already happened is not known to ACPI people, so we're probably doomed to repeating at least some of that. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!