From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51FCC2D0E1 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B104F22274 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729614AbgIIPEC (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:04:02 -0400 Received: from mga06.intel.com ([134.134.136.31]:2359 "EHLO mga06.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726399AbgIIMSo (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:18:44 -0400 IronPort-SDR: Uo3eCdVbOKruVKp2lql8FH0+TBQqekgxkSi24YXUWnTEZLGtZbfSWTbBKmlyU+K447Fqc/snu5 sBA8ZZK6BrLg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9738"; a="219874839" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,409,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="219874839" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2020 05:16:42 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 700qIIIuvykqXE2gqCdKoiRkvZqgnZfWaFbrA1VXnX36kZp141OQRBjFeTaSAw3mJgI6JTqBQd qwfNlpoo2qpg== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,409,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="480442307" Received: from paasikivi.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.42]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Sep 2020 05:16:39 -0700 Received: by paasikivi.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AAA5C20765; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:16:07 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:16:07 +0300 From: Sakari Ailus To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: linux-i2c , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ACPI Devel Maling List , LKML , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rajmohan Mani , Tomasz Figa , Bingbu Cao , Chiranjeevi Rapolu , Hyungwoo Yang , linux-media , Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 6/6] at24: Support probing while off Message-ID: <20200909121607.GD6566@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> References: <20200903081550.6012-1-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20200903081550.6012-7-sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> <20200909111121.GJ2272@ninjato> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 01:56:34PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:11 PM Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > > > This currently conflicts with the fix I queued for at24 for v5.9. > > > Which tree is going to take this series? > > > > I recall we agreed on I2C. > > > > Sakari, > > can you rebase the at24 driver patch on top of Wolfram's tree as soon > as he merges my PR with at24 fixes? Sure! This would be of course better than postponing this patch. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus