> I think we might be overly complicating things. IMHO the series as is
> with the "i2c_" prefix removed from the flags introduced would be
> reusable as is for any other subsystem that needs it. Of course, for
> now, the handling of the flag would remain implemented only in the I2C
> subsystem.

Just to be clear: you are suggesting to remove "i2c" from the DSD
binding "i2c-allow-low-power-probe". And you are not talking about
moving I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE to struct device_driver? I
recall the latter has been NACKed by gkh so far.