linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / CPPC: Replace cppc_attr with kobj_attribute
Date: Wed,  7 Apr 2021 14:30:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210407213048.940498-1-nathan@kernel.org> (raw)

All of the CPPC sysfs show functions are called via indirect call in
kobj_attr_show(), where they should be of type

ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf);

because that is the type of the ->show() member in
'struct kobj_attribute' but they are actually of type

ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf);

because of the ->show() member in 'struct cppc_attr', resulting in a
Control Flow Integrity violation [1].

$ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/acpi_cppc/highest_perf
3400

$ dmesg | grep "CFI failure"
[  175.970559] CFI failure (target: show_highest_perf+0x0/0x8):

As far as I can tell, the only different between 'struct cppc_attr' and
'struct kobj_attribute' aside from the type of the attr parameter is the
type of the count parameter in the ->store() member (ssize_t vs.
size_t), which does not actually matter because all of these nodes are
read-only.

Eliminate 'struct cppc_attr' in favor of 'struct kobj_attribute' to fix
the violation.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401233216.2540591-1-samitolvanen@google.com/

Fixes: 158c998ea44b ("ACPI / CPPC: add sysfs support to compute delivered performance")
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1343
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 14 +++-----------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index 69057fcd2c04..a5e6fd0bafa1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -119,23 +119,15 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpc_desc *, cpc_desc_ptr);
  */
 #define NUM_RETRIES 500ULL
 
-struct cppc_attr {
-	struct attribute attr;
-	ssize_t (*show)(struct kobject *kobj,
-			struct attribute *attr, char *buf);
-	ssize_t (*store)(struct kobject *kobj,
-			struct attribute *attr, const char *c, ssize_t count);
-};
-
 #define define_one_cppc_ro(_name)		\
-static struct cppc_attr _name =			\
+static struct kobj_attribute _name =		\
 __ATTR(_name, 0444, show_##_name, NULL)
 
 #define to_cpc_desc(a) container_of(a, struct cpc_desc, kobj)
 
 #define show_cppc_data(access_fn, struct_name, member_name)		\
 	static ssize_t show_##member_name(struct kobject *kobj,		\
-					struct attribute *attr,	char *buf) \
+				struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)	\
 	{								\
 		struct cpc_desc *cpc_ptr = to_cpc_desc(kobj);		\
 		struct struct_name st_name = {0};			\
@@ -161,7 +153,7 @@ show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, reference_perf);
 show_cppc_data(cppc_get_perf_ctrs, cppc_perf_fb_ctrs, wraparound_time);
 
 static ssize_t show_feedback_ctrs(struct kobject *kobj,
-		struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
+		struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	struct cpc_desc *cpc_ptr = to_cpc_desc(kobj);
 	struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs fb_ctrs = {0};

base-commit: 454859c552da78b0f587205d308401922b56863e
-- 
2.31.0


             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-07 21:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-07 21:30 Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2021-04-08 17:59 ` [PATCH] ACPI / CPPC: Replace cppc_attr with kobj_attribute Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210407213048.940498-1-nathan@kernel.org \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).