From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FACFC433F5 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 10:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181EF60E78 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 10:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235781AbhJKKMf (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:12:35 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:42498 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235726AbhJKKMf (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:12:35 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EB41FB; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:10:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bogus (unknown [10.57.21.181]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37ECE3F66F; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 03:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 11:09:49 +0100 From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jassi Brar Cc: Cristian Marussi , "Rafael J . Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] mailbox: pcc: Add support for PCCT extended PCC subspaces Message-ID: <20211011100949.4ck26vos5apts45e@bogus> References: <20210917133357.1911092-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210917133357.1911092-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Jassi, On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:33:43PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi, > > Though the series is about adding support for PCCT extended PCC subspaces, > except one patch, remaining are either preparatory or clean up to add > the PCCT extended PCC subspaces. Only patch 12 adds the support of extended > PCC type3/4 subspaces. > > The main change affecting your is the change in pcc_mbox_request_channel > to avoid clien driver using con_priv member which is designed for controller > private pointer rather than for client's to use that. > Once I have ack from Guenter, is it OK to get this merged via mailbox tree. Rafael is happy for me to maintain this PCC part of ACPI. Do you prefer to merge patches directly or do you prefer pull request ? Let me know. -- Regards, Sudeep