From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7284C433EF for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2022 17:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242514AbiAERqx (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:46:53 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:35733 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242509AbiAERqw (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:46:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1641404812; x=1672940812; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=HG/5iccwAFaXwpkSi5oT26UvgeoYhpgBrYfY7nFNaIU=; b=GNn81nuHZEv4Ht2ZyJ5jWQNQT5mI0b/iI+Q2NviLkzJzgyM5FcxQpoKq 3+KeXkIPRcm+/JC27LeW/NR8nLKFUG4MG86dXpPX2ax1lk6wxvisMzMzQ 3dKo6d2nOD2XMKFLmPtN5npsZ/uiZjQ0DFz8CUoKQK5VI+KoNotm5AStF e0QNr6atBrzJ/dp4cc2BHo97T/G4EKVvBDISu4meRkdBJSb98ksQxthSo L1yibD1RIELsl+HsoU1lsSNk7+jR5DbB9HZbRlf9s2d1cU7dFuYGV2sIZ uz7tnRw5ndWx7+bsDdRMW5YSXkkoNAV/TlI0jBlQJPf6hHuLDQekW2vwA g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10217"; a="242292507" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,264,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="242292507" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Jan 2022 09:46:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,264,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="513052828" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO e357b3ef1427) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2022 09:46:48 -0800 Received: from kbuild by e357b3ef1427 with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n5AN5-000Gtv-NX; Wed, 05 Jan 2022 17:46:47 +0000 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 01:45:56 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Sudeep Holla , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , "Rafael J . Wysocki" Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Sudeep Holla Subject: [RFC PATCH] ACPI: PCC: pcc_ctx can be static Message-ID: <20220105174554.GA29945@1e936cf764ba> References: <20220103155838.616580-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220103155838.616580-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c:34:22: warning: symbol 'pcc_ctx' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- acpi_pcc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c index 64552fdb73470..9df4d740b52a6 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct pcc_data { struct acpi_pcc_info ctx; }; -struct acpi_pcc_info pcc_ctx; +static struct acpi_pcc_info pcc_ctx; static void pcc_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m) {