From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E306C6FD1F for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:07:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230464AbjCINHE (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 08:07:04 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50440 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229895AbjCINHD (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 08:07:03 -0500 Received: from muru.com (muru.com [72.249.23.125]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5D5B56FB; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 05:07:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB63A80DE; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 15:07:00 +0200 From: Tony Lindgren To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Ilpo =?utf-8?B?SsOkcnZpbmVu?= , Johan Hovold , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Vignesh Raghavendra , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] serial: core: Start managing serial controllers to enable runtime PM Message-ID: <20230309130700.GH7501@atomide.com> References: <20230309085713.57700-1-tony@atomide.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org * Andy Shevchenko [230309 12:23]: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 10:57:08AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > + err = pm_runtime_get(port_dev); > > Is not sync API a deliberate choice? Do we need to comment on why is so? I don't think it can be sync version.. See where all __uart_start() may get called from. The pm_runtime_get() here is needed so the check for pm_runtime_active() won't be racy. Maybe we can now leave out the "start TX anyways" part though. Thanks for your other comments too, will fix up those for the next revision. Regards, Tony