From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ACPI: processor: Add QoS requests for all CPUs
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 02:41:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2435090.1mJ0fSsrDY@kreacher> (raw)
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The _PPC change notifications from the platform firmware are per-CPU,
so acpi_processor_ppc_init() needs to add a frequency QoS request
for each CPU covered by a cpufreq policy to take all of them into
account.
Even though ACPI thermal control of CPUs sets frequency limits
per processor package, it also needs a frequency QoS request for each
CPU in a cpufreq policy in case some of them are taken offline and
the frequency limit needs to be set through the remaining online
ones (this is slightly excessive, because all CPUs covered by one
cpufreq policy will set the same frequency limit through their QoS
requests, but it is not incorrect).
Modify the code in accordance with the above observations.
Fixes: d15ce412737a ("ACPI: cpufreq: Switch to QoS requests instead of cpufreq notifier")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
@@ -127,26 +127,34 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(unsigne
void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- int cpu = policy->cpu;
- struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
- int ret;
-
- if (!pr)
- return;
-
- ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints, &pr->thermal_req,
- FREQ_QOS_MAX, INT_MAX);
- if (ret < 0)
- pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu,
- ret);
+ unsigned int cpu;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) {
+ struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!pr)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints,
+ &pr->thermal_req,
+ FREQ_QOS_MAX, INT_MAX);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n",
+ cpu, ret);
+ }
}
void acpi_thermal_cpufreq_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, policy->cpu);
+ unsigned int cpu;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) {
+ struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, policy->cpu);
- if (pr)
- freq_qos_remove_request(&pr->thermal_req);
+ if (pr)
+ freq_qos_remove_request(&pr->thermal_req);
+ }
}
#else /* ! CONFIG_CPU_FREQ */
static int cpufreq_get_max_state(unsigned int cpu)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -159,26 +159,34 @@ void acpi_processor_ignore_ppc_init(void
void acpi_processor_ppc_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- int cpu = policy->cpu;
- struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
- int ret;
-
- if (!pr)
- return;
-
- ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints, &pr->perflib_req,
- FREQ_QOS_MAX, INT_MAX);
- if (ret < 0)
- pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n", cpu,
- ret);
+ unsigned int cpu;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) {
+ struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!pr)
+ continue;
+
+ ret = freq_qos_add_request(&policy->constraints,
+ &pr->perflib_req,
+ FREQ_QOS_MAX, INT_MAX);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ pr_err("Failed to add freq constraint for CPU%d (%d)\n",
+ cpu, ret);
+ }
}
void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
- struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, policy->cpu);
+ unsigned int cpu;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus) {
+ struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
- if (pr)
- freq_qos_remove_request(&pr->perflib_req);
+ if (pr)
+ freq_qos_remove_request(&pr->perflib_req);
+ }
}
static int acpi_processor_get_performance_control(struct acpi_processor *pr)
next reply other threads:[~2019-10-25 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-25 0:41 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-10-25 2:53 ` [PATCH] ACPI: processor: Add QoS requests for all CPUs Viresh Kumar
2019-10-25 8:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-25 8:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-10-25 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-25 8:51 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2435090.1mJ0fSsrDY@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).