Linux-ACPI Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
To: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Cc: "aubrey.li@linux.intel.com" <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"bsegall@google.com" <bsegall@google.com>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"dietmar.eggemann@arm.com" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"guodong.xu@linaro.org" <guodong.xu@linaro.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	"juri.lelli@redhat.com" <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linuxarm@openeuler.org" <linuxarm@openeuler.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"mgorman@suse.de" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"msys.mizuma@gmail.com" <msys.mizuma@gmail.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
	"rjw@rjwysocki.net" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"sudeep.holla@arm.com" <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	"valentin.schneider@arm.com" <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	"vincent.guittot@linaro.org" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@huawei.com>,
	yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
	"tiantao (H)" <tiantao6@hisilicon.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a die
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 03:46:04 +0000
Message-ID: <2fcccd7430f945e9badf693627298fdd@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210428094811.159245-1-drjones@redhat.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Jones [mailto:drjones@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 9:48 PM
> To: Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
> Cc: aubrey.li@linux.intel.com; bp@alien8.de; bsegall@google.com;
> catalin.marinas@arm.com; dietmar.eggemann@arm.com;
> gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; guodong.xu@linaro.org; hpa@zytor.com; Jonathan
> Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>; juri.lelli@redhat.com;
> lenb@kernel.org; Liguozhu (Kenneth) <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>;
> linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linuxarm@openeuler.org; mark.rutland@arm.com;
> mgorman@suse.de; mingo@redhat.com; msys.mizuma@gmail.com;
> peterz@infradead.org; Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>;
> rjw@rjwysocki.net; rostedt@goodmis.org; sudeep.holla@arm.com;
> tglx@linutronix.de; tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com; valentin.schneider@arm.com;
> vincent.guittot@linaro.org; will@kernel.org; x86@kernel.org; xuwei (O)
> <xuwei5@huawei.com>; yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within
> a die
> 
> On 20/04/2021 12:18, Barry Song wrote:
> ...
> > Currently the ID provided is the offset of the Processor
> > Hierarchy Nodes Structure within PPTT.  Whilst this is unique
> > it is not terribly elegant so alternative suggestions welcome.
> >
> 
> The ACPI table offsets are consistent with how other topology IDs are
> generated. I once tried to make them a little more human friendly with
> [1], but it was nacked.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180629132934.GA16282@e107155-lin/t/
> 

Ideally, we are going to check if cluster node has a valid UID,
if yes, read this ID; otherwise, fall back to use offset.

Will move to that way in next version.

> Thanks,
> drew

Thanks
Barry

  reply index

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-20  0:18 [RFC PATCH v6 0/4] scheduler: expose the topology of clusters and add cluster scheduler Barry Song
2021-04-20  0:18 ` [RFC PATCH v6 1/4] topology: Represent clusters of CPUs within a die Barry Song
2021-04-28  9:48   ` Andrew Jones
2021-04-30  3:46     ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) [this message]
2021-04-20  0:18 ` [RFC PATCH v6 2/4] scheduler: add scheduler level for clusters Barry Song
2021-04-20  0:18 ` [RFC PATCH v6 3/4] scheduler: scan idle cpu in cluster for tasks within one LLC Barry Song
2021-04-27 11:35   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-04-28  9:51     ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-04-28 13:04       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-04-28 16:47         ` Dietmar Eggemann
     [not found]           ` <185746c4d02a485ca8f3509439328b26@hisilicon.com>
2021-04-30 10:42             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-05-03  6:19               ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-05-03 11:35               ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-05-05 12:29                 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-05-07 13:07                   ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-05-13 12:32                     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-05-25  8:14                       ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-05-26  9:54                       ` Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-04-20  0:18 ` [RFC PATCH v6 4/4] scheduler: Add cluster scheduler level for x86 Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2fcccd7430f945e9badf693627298fdd@hisilicon.com \
    --to=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tiantao6@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xuwei5@huawei.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ACPI Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/0 linux-acpi/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-acpi linux-acpi/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi \
		linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-acpi

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-acpi


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git