From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: acpi_get_devices() crash when acpi_disabled==true (was [PATCH v2] drm/privacy-screen: honor acpi=off in detect_thinkpad_privacy_screen)
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:39:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47823b47-3743-e6b7-0665-d5743713d198@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hXKJhCSKki8JHs+Q=3BWYygDNz9LLAaiVKpDvLPr6-ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On 1/27/22 14:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:05 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 1/26/22 18:11, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 5:41 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 1/26/22 16:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 2:47 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/23/22 10:10, Tong Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>> when acpi=off is provided in bootarg, kernel crash with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [ 1.252739] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
>>>>>>> [ 1.258308] Call Trace:
>>>>>>> [ 1.258490] ? acpi_walk_namespace+0x147/0x147
>>>>>>> [ 1.258770] acpi_get_devices+0xe4/0x137
>>>>>>> [ 1.258921] ? drm_core_init+0xc0/0xc0 [drm]
>>>>>>> [ 1.259108] detect_thinkpad_privacy_screen+0x5e/0xa8 [drm]
>>>>>>> [ 1.259337] drm_privacy_screen_lookup_init+0xe/0xe85 [drm]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reason is that acpi_walk_namespace expects acpi related stuff
>>>>>>> initialized but in fact it wouldn't when acpi is set to off. In this case
>>>>>>> we should honor acpi=off in detect_thinkpad_privacy_screen().
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tong Zhang <ztong0001@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for catching this and thank you for your patch. I was about to merge
>>>>>> this, but then I realized that this might not be the best way to fix this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A quick grep shows 10 acpi_get_devices() calls outside of drivers/acpi,
>>>>>> and at a first glance about half of those are missing an acpi_disabled
>>>>>> check. IMHO it would be better to simply add an acpi_disabled check to
>>>>>> acpi_get_devices() itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rafael, do you agree ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I do.
>>>>
>>>> Did you see my follow-up that that is not going to work because
>>>> acpi_get_devices() is an acpica function ?
>>>
>>> No, I didn't, but it is possible to add a wrapper doing the check
>>> around it and convert all of the users.
>>
>> Yes I did think about that. Note that I've gone ahead and pushed
>> the fix which started this to drm-misc-fixes, to resolve the crash
>> for now.
>
> OK
>
>> If we add such a wrapper we can remove a bunch of acpi_disabled checks
>> from various callers.
>>
>>> Alternatively, the ACPICA function can check acpi_gbl_root_node
>>> against NULL, like in the attached (untested) patch.
>>
>> That is probably an even better idea, as that avoids the need
>> for a wrapper altogether. So I believe that that is the best
>> solution.
>
> Allright, let me cut an analogous patch for the upstream ACPICA, then.
Great, thank you.
I have added a note about checking for when this has found its way
into Linus' tree to my own TODO list, with the goal of doing
a cleanup series removing the then no longer needed acpi_disabled
checks in a bunch of places.
Regards,
Hans
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220123091004.763775-1-ztong0001@gmail.com>
2022-01-26 13:47 ` acpi_get_devices() crash when acpi_disabled==true (was [PATCH v2] drm/privacy-screen: honor acpi=off in detect_thinkpad_privacy_screen) Hans de Goede
2022-01-26 14:25 ` Hans de Goede
2022-01-26 15:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-01-26 16:41 ` Hans de Goede
2022-01-26 17:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-01-27 13:05 ` Hans de Goede
2022-01-27 13:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-01-27 13:39 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47823b47-3743-e6b7-0665-d5743713d198@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=ztong0001@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).