From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Hans De Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Robert R. Howell" <RHowell@uwyo.edu>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] PM: PCI/ACPI: Hibernation handling fixes
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2019 12:42:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4976412.ihyb9sT5jY@kreacher> (raw)
Hi All,
This series of patches addresses a few issues related to the handling of
hibernation in the PCI bus type and the ACPI PM domain and ACPI LPSS driver.
The v2 addresses Hans' concerns regarding the LPSS changes.
First of all, all of the runtime-suspended PCI devices and devices in the ACPI PM and LPSS
PM domains will be resumed during hibernation (first patch). This appears to be the
only way to avoid weird corner cases and the benefit from avoiding to resume those
devices during hibernation is questionable.
That change allows the the hibernation callbacks in all of the involved subsystems to be
simplified (patches 2 and 3).
Moreover, reusing bus-level suspend callbacks for the "poweroff" transition during
hibernation (which is the case for the ACPI PM domain and LPSS) is incorrect, so patch 4
fixes that.
Finally, there are some leftover items in linux/acpi.h that can be dropped (patch 5).
Thanks,
Rafael
next reply other threads:[~2019-07-01 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-01 10:42 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-07-01 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] PM: ACPI/PCI: Resume all devices during hibernation Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-01 16:15 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-07-02 15:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-02 4:24 ` Robert R. Howell
2019-07-01 10:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] PCI: PM: Simplify bus-level hibernation callbacks Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI: PM: Simplify and fix PM domain " Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-01 10:54 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI: PM: Introduce "poweroff" callbacks for ACPI PM domain and LPSS Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-01 10:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: PM: Drop unused function and function header Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-07-01 11:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] PM: PCI/ACPI: Hibernation handling fixes Hans de Goede
2019-07-01 16:20 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-07-05 9:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4976412.ihyb9sT5jY@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=RHowell@uwyo.edu \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).