From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
ioana.ciornei@nxp.com, diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com, maz@kernel.org,
jon@solid-run.com, pankaj.bansal@nxp.com,
makarand.pawagi@nxp.com, calvin.johnson@nxp.com, V.Sethi@nxp.com,
cristian.sovaiala@nxp.com, Stuart.Yoder@arm.com,
jeremy.linton@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
jason@lakedaemon.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] bus: fsl-mc: add custom .dma_configure implementation
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 18:48:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <499fbf9a-416f-d7c7-0655-881d92138a6c@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200325125109.GA5430@red-moon.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi Lorenzo,
On 3/25/2020 2:51 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:05:39PM +0200, laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com wrote:
>> From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
>>
>> The devices on this bus are not discovered by way of device tree
>> but by queries to the firmware. It makes little sense to trick the
>> generic of layer into thinking that these devices are of related so
>> that we can get our dma configuration. Instead of doing that, add
>> our custom dma configuration implementation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
>> index 36eb25f82c8e..eafaa0e0b906 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/fsl-mc-bus.c
>> @@ -132,11 +132,40 @@ static int fsl_mc_bus_uevent(struct device *dev, struct kobj_uevent_env *env)
>> static int fsl_mc_dma_configure(struct device *dev)
>> {
>> struct device *dma_dev = dev;
>> + struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec;
>> + const struct iommu_ops *iommu_ops;
>> + struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev = to_fsl_mc_device(dev);
>> + int ret;
>> + u32 icid;
>>
>> while (dev_is_fsl_mc(dma_dev))
>> dma_dev = dma_dev->parent;
>>
>> - return of_dma_configure(dev, dma_dev->of_node, 0);
>> + fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dma_dev);
>> + if (!fwspec)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + iommu_ops = iommu_ops_from_fwnode(fwspec->iommu_fwnode);
>> + if (!iommu_ops)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + ret = iommu_fwspec_init(dev, fwspec->iommu_fwnode, iommu_ops);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + icid = mc_dev->icid;
>> + ret = iommu_fwspec_add_ids(dev, &icid, 1);
>
> I see. So with this patch we would use the MC named component only to
> retrieve the iommu_ops
Right. I'd also add that the implementation tries to follow the existing
standard .dma_configure implementations, e.g. of_dma_configure +
of_iommu_configure. I'd also note that similarly to the ACPI case, this
MC FW device is probed as a platform device in the DT scenario, binding
here [1].
A similar approach is used for the retrieval of the msi irq domain, see
following patch.
> - the streamid are injected directly here bypassing OF/IORT bindings translations altogether.
Actually I've submitted a v2 [2] that calls into .of_xlate() to allow
the smmu driver to do some processing on the raw streamid coming from
the firmware. I have not yet tested this with ACPI but expect it to
work, however, it's debatable how valid is this approach in the context
of ACPI.
> Am I reading this code correctly ?
Yes. Thanks for taking the time.
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/fsl,qoriq-mc.txt
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg794757.html
---
Best Regards, Laurentiu
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + if (!device_iommu_mapped(dev)) {
>> + ret = iommu_probe_device(dev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + arch_setup_dma_ops(dev, 0, *dma_dev->dma_mask + 1, iommu_ops, true);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static ssize_t modalias_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 10:05 [RFC PATCH 1/4] bus: fsl-mc: add custom .dma_configure implementation laurentiu.tudor
2020-02-27 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] irqchip/fsl-mc: Change the way the IRQ domain is set for MC devices laurentiu.tudor
2020-02-27 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] bus: fsl-mc: Add ACPI support for fsl-mc laurentiu.tudor
2020-02-27 10:05 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] iommu/of: get rid of fsl-mc specific code laurentiu.tudor
2020-03-25 12:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] bus: fsl-mc: add custom .dma_configure implementation Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-03-25 16:48 ` Laurentiu Tudor [this message]
2020-04-14 14:32 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-04-15 5:42 ` [EXT] " Makarand Pawagi
2020-04-15 15:43 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-04-15 15:44 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-04-15 16:04 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-04-16 14:38 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2020-04-15 17:31 ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-23 9:56 ` [EXT] " Makarand Pawagi
2020-04-23 11:09 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=499fbf9a-416f-d7c7-0655-881d92138a6c@nxp.com \
--to=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
--cc=Stuart.Yoder@arm.com \
--cc=V.Sethi@nxp.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=calvin.johnson@nxp.com \
--cc=cristian.sovaiala@nxp.com \
--cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=jon@solid-run.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=makarand.pawagi@nxp.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pankaj.bansal@nxp.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).