From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
David Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>,
"Artem Bityutskiy" <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] intel_idle: Introduce 'states_off' module parameter
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 11:07:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86fb1cd10e344f76a3e96c4b6c722680@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16995896.bQtfYxEEOs@kreacher>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Sent: 30 January 2020 14:47
>
> In certain system configurations it may not be desirable to use some
> C-states assumed to be available by intel_idle and the driver needs
> to be prevented from using them even before the cpuidle sysfs
> interface becomes accessible to user space. Currently, the only way
> to achieve that is by setting the 'max_cstate' module parameter to a
> value lower than the index of the shallowest of the C-states in
> question, but that may be overly intrusive, because it effectively
> makes all of the idle states deeper than the 'max_cstate' one go
> away (and the C-state to avoid may be in the middle of the range
> normally regarded as available).
>
> To allow that limitation to be overcome, introduce a new module
> parameter called 'states_off' to represent a list of idle states to
> be disabled by default in the form of a bitmask and update the
> documentation to cover it.
The problem I see is that there are (at least) 3 different ways of
referring to the C-States:
1) The state names, C1, C1E, C3, C7 etc.
I'm not sure these are visible outside intel_idle.c.
2) The maximum allowed latency in us.
3) The index into the cpu-dependant tables in intel_idle.c.
Boot parameters that set 3 are completely hopeless for normal
users. The C-state names might be - but they aren't documented.
Unless you know exactly which cpu table is being used the
only constraint a user can request is the latency.
(I've had the misfortune to read intel_idle.c in the last week.
Almost impenetrable TLA ridden uncommented code.)
...
> + * The positions of the bits that are set in the two's complement representation
> + * of this value are the indices of the idle states to be disabled by default
> + * (as reflected by the names of the corresponding idle state directories in
> + * sysfs, "state0", "state1" ... "state<i>" ..., where <i> is the index of the
> + * given state).
What has 'two's complement' got to do with anything?
...
> +The value of the ``states_off`` module parameter (0 by default) represents a
> +list of idle states to be disabled by default in the form of a bitmask. Namely,
> +the positions of the bits that are set in the two's complement representation of
> +that value are the indices of idle states to be disabled by default (as
> +reflected by the names of the corresponding idle state directories in ``sysfs``,
> +:file:`state0`, :file:`state1` ... :file:`state<i>` ..., where ``<i>`` is the
> +index of the given idle state; see :ref:`idle-states-representation` in
> +:doc:`cpuidle`). For example, if ``states_off`` is equal to 3, the driver will
> +disable idle states 0 and 1 by default, and if it is equal to 8, idle state 3
> +will be disabled by default and so on (bit positions beyond the maximum idle
> +state index are ignored). The idle states disabled this way can be enabled (on
> +a per-CPU basis) from user space via ``sysfs``.
A few line breaks would make that easier to read.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-31 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-30 14:44 [PATCH 0/2] intel_idle: Two new module parameters Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-01-30 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] intel_idle: Introduce 'use_acpi' module parameter Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-02 14:23 ` kbuild test robot
2020-01-30 14:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] intel_idle: Introduce 'states_off' " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-01-31 11:07 ` David Laight [this message]
2020-01-31 11:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-01-31 11:24 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2020-01-31 11:54 ` David Laight
2020-01-31 12:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-03 11:13 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] intel_idle: Two new module parameters Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-03 11:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] intel_idle: Introduce 'use_acpi' module parameter Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-03 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] intel_idle: Introduce 'states_off' " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86fb1cd10e344f76a3e96c4b6c722680@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).